Player Dossier

2011-2013

South Carolina

Bruce Ellington

WR • 5'9" • Moncks Corner, SC, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Bruce Ellington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

19.5

Efficiency

86.4

Consistency

56.1

Season Value

65.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · South Carolina

111112121313

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
South Carolina
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Bruce Ellington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · South Carolina. Bruce Ellington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Bruce Ellington played WR for South Carolina. Across 3 tracked seasons, Bruce Ellington recorded 36 passing yards, 148 rushing yards, and 1,586 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with South Carolina.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

South Carolina paired 775 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · South Carolina

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

64.6

Efficiency

86.4

Usage

19.5

Consistency

56.1

Best Game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 140. North Carolina: 17. Georgia: 13. Vanderbilt: 111. UCF: 88. Kentucky: 7. Arkansas: 96. Missouri: 136. Mississippi State: 6. Florida: 67. Unknown: 43. Clemson: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 100. North Carolina: 1 by 100. Georgia: 1 by 86.7. Vanderbilt: 8 by 92.5. UCF: 4 by 100. Kentucky: 1 by 46.7. Arkansas: 6 by 100. Missouri: 10 by 90.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 40. Florida: 4 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 95.6. Clemson: 4 by 85

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins71.9 · Games = 10
First Half62.7 · Games = 6 · -3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half66.5 · Games = 6 · +3.8 vs First Half
All Games64.6 · Games = 12

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Best efficiency game

100 vs Wisconsin

Result
Wed 1/1vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 34-24614023.323.30239
Sun 12/1vs ClemsonW 31-1745111.612.80029
Sat 11/23vs Unknown34314.314.30017
Sun 11/17vs FloridaW 19-1446714.416.80132
Sat 11/2vs Mississippi StateW 34-16166606
Sat 10/26@ Missouri100 receiving yards · High volumeW 27-241013613.613.60223
Sat 10/12@ Arkansas2+ TDW 52-76961616253
Sat 10/5vs KentuckyW 35-28177707
Sat 9/28@ UCFW 28-254881822027
Sat 9/14vs Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volumeW 35-25811113.913.90139
Sat 9/7@ GeorgiaL 30-411131313013
Thu 8/29vs North CarolinaW 27-101171717017

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    South Carolina

    2011-2013

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201120112012201220132013
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2011 PostseasonSouth Carolina21162.715.3
2011 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina21162.715.30
2012 PostseasonSouth Carolina60088.920.3389
2012 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina60088.920.30
2013 PostseasonSouth Carolina77586.419.5175
2013 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina77586.419.50

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Arkansas

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

104

Primary metric

104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

UAB

98

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Wisconsin

140

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Tennessee

101

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Clemson

71

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2013 Postseason · South Carolina

775 primary output · 86.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage

65.5

#2

2013 Regular Season · South Carolina

65.5

775 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 19.5 usage

#3

2012 Postseason · South Carolina

62.3

600 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 20.3 usage

Milestones

5

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

4

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.9185

Erasmus Hall · Brooklyn, NY

Committed To
Texas A&M
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

1,586

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.