Usage Score
32
Player Dossier
2023-2025California
WR • 5'7" • 170 lbs • Manteca, CA, USA
Jacob De Jesus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
32
Efficiency
66
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · California
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob De Jesus, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · California. Jacob De Jesus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jacob De Jesus played WR for UNLV and California. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jacob De Jesus recorded 27 passing yards, 146 rushing yards, and 2,140 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with California.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
California paired 1,022 primary output with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UNLV, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.6
Efficiency
66
Usage
32
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 138. Oregon State: 26. Texas Southern: 61. Minnesota: 54. San Diego State: 35. Boston College: 61. Duke: 56. North Carolina: 105. Virginia Tech: 86. Virginia: 49. Louisville: 158. Stanford: 96. SMU: 97
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 9 by 100. Oregon State: 4 by 43.3. Texas Southern: 5 by 81.3. Minnesota: 7 by 51.4. San Diego State: 3 by 77.8. Boston College: 8 by 50.8. Duke: 6 by 62.2. North Carolina: 13 by 53.8. Virginia Tech: 8 by 71.7. Virginia: 2 by 100. Louisville: 16 by 65.8. Stanford: 14 by 45.7. SMU: 12 by 53.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Best efficiency game
100 vs Hawai'i
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/25 | @ Hawai'i100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-35 | — | 9 | 138 | 14.2 | 15.30 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs SMUHigh volume | W 38-35 | — | 12 | 97 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ StanfordHigh volume | L 10-31 | — | 14 | 96 | 6 | 6.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | W 29-26 | — | 16 | 158 | 9.4 | 9.90 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Virginia | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 49 | 17.7 | 24.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 10/24 | @ Virginia TechHigh volume | L 34-42 | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs North Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 21-18 | — | 13 | 105 | 7.3 | 8.10 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Duke | L 21-45 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Boston CollegeHigh volume | W 28-24 | — | 8 | 61 | 5.8 | 7.60 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ San Diego State | L 0-34 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Minnesota | W 27-14 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas Southern | W 35-3 | — | 5 | 61 | 11.5 | 12.20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Oregon State | W 34-15 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UNLV
2023-2024
Opening stop
California
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | UNLV | 606 | 63.2 | 24.7 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UNLV | 606 | 63.2 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UNLV | 512 | 74.1 | 21.8 | -94 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UNLV | 512 | 74.1 | 21.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | California | 1,022 | 66 | 32 | 510 |
| 2025 Regular Season | California | 1,022 | 66 | 32 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
Hawai'i
138
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
158
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 65.8 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon State
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · California
1,022 primary output · 66 efficiency · 32 usage
64.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · California
64.1
1,022 primary · 66 efficiency · 32 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · UNLV
53.3
512 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 21.8 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,140
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.