Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Pittsburgh
QB • 6'3" • 220 lbs • East Greenwich, RI, USA
David Lynch is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
43.6
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
54
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Lynch, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Postseason · Pittsburgh. David Lynch is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
David Lynch played QB for Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Lynch recorded 111 passing yards and -14 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 97 primary output with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
32.3
Efficiency
43.6
Usage
5.2
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 52. Louisville: 42. Boston College: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 20 by 35.3. Louisville: 9 by 41.4. Boston College: 2 by 54.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
54.2 vs Boston College
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 97 | 43.6 | 5.2 | 97 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 97 | 43.6 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | -97 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
52
Primary metric
52 total offense with 35.3 efficiency.
#2
Louisville
42
Primary metric
Loss with 42 yards of offense and 41.4 efficiency.
42 total offense with 41.4 efficiency.
#3
Boston College
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 yards of offense and 54.2 efficiency.
3 total offense with 54.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Postseason · Pittsburgh
97 primary output · 43.6 efficiency · 5.2 usage
54
#2
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
54
97 primary · 43.6 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
97
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.