Usage Score
20.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Rutgers
DT Sheffield
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Corinth, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
DT Sheffield reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.6
Consistency
64.7
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · North Texas
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Washington State • North Texas • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DT Sheffield, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · North Texas. DT Sheffield reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
DT Sheffield played WR for Washington State, North Texas, and Rutgers. Across 3 tracked seasons, DT Sheffield recorded 86 rushing yards, 1,422 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with North Texas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
North Texas paired 822 primary output with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, North Texas, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
48.1
Efficiency
77.6
Usage
20.2
Consistency
64.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 85. Miami (OH): 37. Norfolk State: 79. Iowa: 51. Minnesota: 74. Washington: 68. Oregon: 26. Purdue: 24. Illinois: 32. Maryland: 56. Ohio State: 18. Penn State: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 49.3. Norfolk State: 3 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 5 by 98.7. Washington: 6 by 75.6. Oregon: 3 by 57.8. Purdue: 3 by 53.3. Illinois: 4 by 53.3. Maryland: 4 by 93.3. Ohio State: 2 by 60. Penn State: 2 by 90
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins56.2 · Games = 5 · +13.9 vs Losses
Losses42.3 · Games = 7 · -13.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Penn State | L 36-40 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Ohio State | L 9-42 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Maryland | W 35-20 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Illinois | L 13-35 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Purdue | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Oregon | L 10-56 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Washington | L 19-38 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-31 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Iowa | L 28-38 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Norfolk State | W 60-10 | — | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 45-17 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 11 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Ohio | W 34-31 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2023
Opening stop
- 2
North Texas
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Rutgers
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington State | 23 | 27.8 | 8.5 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Texas | 822 | 76.3 | 20.8 | 799 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rutgers | 577 | 77.6 | 20.2 | -245 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 76.4 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 92.6 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Regular Season · North Texas
822 primary output · 76.3 efficiency · 20.8 usage
65.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
58.2
577 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 20.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Washington State
25.2
23 primary · 27.8 efficiency · 8.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,422
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring DT Sheffield
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.