Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025San José State
Anthony Garcia
QB • 6'1" • 190 lbs • Sacramento, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileEfficient finisher
Anthony Garcia is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
74.1
Consistency
50.3
Season Value
39.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State
23242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- San José State • Arizona • Utah State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Garcia, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State. Anthony Garcia is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Utah State paired 154 primary output with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across San José State, Arizona, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 100 efficiency. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Utah State
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
12.8
Efficiency
74.1
Usage
3.7
Consistency
50.3
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 6. UTEP: 0. Texas A&M: 3. Air Force: 17. Unknown: 8. Vanderbilt: 15. Hawai'i: 30. San José State: 15. Nevada: 6. UNLV: 21. Fresno State: 36. Boise State: -3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 1 by 60. Texas A&M: 1 by 75. Air Force: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 40. Vanderbilt: 1 by 100. Hawai'i: 1 by 100. San José State: 2 by 85.4. Nevada: 2 by 30. UNLV: 2 by 100. Fresno State: 3 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins14.8 · n=5 · +2.8 vs Losses
Losses12 · n=6 · -2.8 vs Wins
First Half8.2 · n=6 · -9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · n=6 · +9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | vs Washington State | L 21-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Boise State | L 24-25 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Fresno State | W 28-17 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UNLV | L 26-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 2 | 21 | 10.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Nevada | W 51-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs San José State | W 30-25 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 85.4 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Hawai'i | L 26-44 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 35-55 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Air Force | W 49-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 1 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 22-44 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 75 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTEP | W 28-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
San José State
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Arizona
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Utah State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | San José State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona | 1 | 10 | 3.7 | 1 |
| 2025 Postseason | Utah State | 154 | 74.1 | 3.7 | 153 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah State | 154 | 74.1 | 3.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Hawai'i
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
30
Primary metric
30 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Vanderbilt
15
Primary metric
Loss with 15 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
15 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Fresno State
36
Primary metric
Win with 36 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
36 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
UNLV
21
Primary metric
Loss with 21 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
21 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#5
Air Force
17
Primary metric
Win with 17 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
17 total offense with 100 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Utah State
154 primary output · 74.1 efficiency · 3.7 usage
39.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Utah State
39.8
154 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 3.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Arizona
28.5
1 primary · 10 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8359
Capital Christian · Sacramento, CA
- Committed To
- San José State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
3
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
155
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.