Usage Score
27.9
Player Dossier
2023-2025UTSA
Robert Henry
RB • 5'9" • 205 lbs • Lumberton, MS, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Robert Henry leans balanced backfield option traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
60.7
Consistency
59.2
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UTSA
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robert Henry, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UTSA. Robert Henry leans balanced backfield option traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Robert Henry played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Robert Henry recorded 2,339 rushing yards, 428 receiving yards, and 30 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UTSA paired 1,159 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
105.4
Efficiency
60.7
Usage
27.9
Consistency
59.2
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 168. Texas State: 180. Incarnate Word: 152. Colorado State: 220. Temple: 51. Rice: 64. North Texas: 138. Tulane: 91. South Florida: 30. Charlotte: 1. Army: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 19 by 86.8. Texas State: 21 by 85.7. Incarnate Word: 16 by 89.6. Colorado State: 23 by 82.7. Temple: 15 by 36. Rice: 12 by 55.6. North Texas: 12 by 97.9. Tulane: 17 by 56.3. South Florida: 12 by 27.3. Charlotte: 8 by 1.3. Army: 14 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins105.6 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses105.2 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
97.9 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | 13 | 62 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | 8 | 1 | 0.10 | 0 | — | — | 0.1 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | 10 | 27 | 2.70 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane | W 48-26 | 16 | 87 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas100 rush yards | L 17-55 | 12 | 138 | 11.50 | 1 | — | — | 11.5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | 12 | 64 | 5.30 | 1 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | 12 | 42 | 3.50 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 3.4 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 17-16 | 21 | 144 | 6.90 | 1 | 2 | 76 | 9.6 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Incarnate Word100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-20 | 14 | 144 | 10.30 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9.5 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 36-43 | 17 | 159 | 9.40 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 8.6 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 24-42 | 16 | 177 | 11.10 | 2 | 3 | -9 | 8.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 703 | 52.2 | 18 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 703 | 52.2 | 18 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 905 | 55.9 | 21 | 202 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,159 | 60.7 | 27.9 | 254 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
220
Primary metric
220 scrimmage yards and 48.9 usage.
#2
North Texas
225
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
225 scrimmage yards and 29.9 usage.
#3
UAB
108
Primary metric
Win with 108 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
108 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#4
Texas State
180
Primary metric
Loss with 180 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
180 scrimmage yards and 37.5 usage.
#5
Temple
180
Primary metric
Win with 180 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
180 scrimmage yards and 28.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
1,159 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 27.9 usage
62
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
51.2
905 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 21 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · UTSA
49.8
703 primary · 52.2 efficiency · 18 usage
Milestones
7
100+ rush yards
6
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,767
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Robert Henry
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.