Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Florida State
Ashlynd Barker
DB • 6'3" • 216 lbs • Columbus, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ashlynd Barker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.6
Consistency
50.1
Season Value
46.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Florida State
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ashlynd Barker, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Florida State. Ashlynd Barker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.6 disruption score.
Ashlynd Barker played DB for Florida State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ashlynd Barker recorded 77 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Florida State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Florida State paired 11.5 primary output with 28.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Florida State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
28.6
Usage
8.4
Consistency
50.1
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 2. East Texas A&M: 0. Kent State: 0. Virginia: 4. Pittsburgh: 1. Stanford: 1. Wake Forest: 0. Clemson: 2.5. Virginia Tech: 1. NC State: 0. Florida: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 3 by 32.5. East Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 5 by 60.8. Pittsburgh: 5 by 30.8. Stanford: 6 by 35. Wake Forest: 3 by 12.5. Clemson: 7 by 54.2. Virginia Tech: 5 by 30.8. NC State: 5 by 20.8. Florida: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Florida | L 21-40 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ NC State | L 11-21 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Virginia Tech | W 34-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ ClemsonSplash game | L 10-24 | 7 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Wake Forest | W 42-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Stanford | L 13-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Pittsburgh | L 31-34 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/26 | @ Virginia2+ sacks · Splash game | L 38-46 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Kent State | W 66-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs East Texas A&M | W 77-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs AlabamaSplash game | W 31-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida State
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Florida State | 2 | 12.3 | 3.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida State | 2 | 12.3 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida State | 1.5 | 15.7 | 3.5 | -0.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida State | 11.5 | 28.6 | 8.4 | 10 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.5 takeover score.
#2
Pittsburgh
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#3
Clemson
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#4
Charleston Southern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#5
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Florida State
11.5 primary output · 28.6 efficiency · 8.4 usage
46.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · Florida State
10.8
1.5 primary · 15.7 efficiency · 3.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Florida State
9.9
2 primary · 12.3 efficiency · 3.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
77
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Ashlynd Barker
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.