Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Notre Dame
Jordan Faison
WR • 5'10" • 183 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Faison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.4
Consistency
66.7
Season Value
65.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
2323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Faison, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Jordan Faison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jordan Faison played WR for Notre Dame. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jordan Faison recorded 40 passing yards, 24 rushing yards, and 1,318 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Notre Dame.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 640 primary output with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
53.3
Efficiency
73.4
Usage
23.4
Consistency
66.7
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 33. Texas A&M: 17. Purdue: 105. Arkansas: 89. Boise State: 83. NC State: 49. USC: 60. Boston College: 82. Navy: 27. Pittsburgh: 6. Syracuse: 21. Stanford: 68
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 44. Texas A&M: 2 by 56.7. Purdue: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 7 by 84.8. Boise State: 6 by 92.2. NC State: 4 by 81.7. USC: 6 by 66.7. Boston College: 4 by 100. Navy: 4 by 45. Pittsburgh: 1 by 40. Syracuse: 2 by 70. Stanford: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins59 · Games = 10 · +34 vs Losses
Losses25 · Games = 2 · -34 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | @ Stanford | W 49-20 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Syracuse | W 70-7 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Pittsburgh | W 37-15 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Navy | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Boston College | W 25-10 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs USC | W 34-24 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs NC State | W 36-7 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Boise State | W 28-7 | — | 6 | 83 | 10.7 | 13.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Arkansas | W 56-13 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Purdue100 receiving yards | W 56-30 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Texas A&M | L 40-41 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Miami | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 1 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Notre Dame | 322 | 83.6 | 18.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 322 | 83.6 | 18.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Notre Dame | 356 | 70.7 | 15.2 | 34 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 356 | 70.7 | 15.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 640 | 73.4 | 23.4 | 284 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
640 primary output · 73.4 efficiency · 23.4 usage
65.9
#2
2023 Postseason · Notre Dame
52.2
322 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Notre Dame
52.2
322 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 18.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,318
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jordan Faison
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.