Usage Score
21.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Akron
WR • 6'3" • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Marquelo Suel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.1
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
73.2
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquelo Suel, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Akron. Marquelo Suel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Akron paired 820 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
68.3
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
21.1
Consistency
73.2
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 62. Florida International: 99. Unknown: 99. Tennessee: 92. Miami (OH): 105. Bowling Green: 21. Ohio: 28. Northern Illinois: 29. Central Michigan: 65. Kent State: 85. Massachusetts: 105. Toledo: 30
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 7 by 59. Florida International: 7 by 94.3. Unknown: 6 by 100. Tennessee: 12 by 51.1. Miami (OH): 8 by 87.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 46.7. Ohio: 3 by 62.2. Northern Illinois: 2 by 96.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Kent State: 11 by 51.5. Massachusetts: 10 by 70. Toledo: 3 by 66.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/21 | @ Toledo | L 23-35 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-22 | — | 10 | 105 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Kent StateHigh volume | L 24-35 | — | 11 | 85 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-35 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Northern Illinois | L 7-37 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Ohio | L 28-34 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | L 10-24 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | L 49-56 | — | 8 | 105 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ TennesseeHigh volume | L 26-47 | — | 12 | 92 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida International2+ TD | L 38-41 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 2 | 24 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs UCF | L 14-56 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 1 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Akron | 417 | 68.3 | 23.1 | 417 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 820 | 73.8 | 21.1 | 403 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 67.9 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
99
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Akron
820 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 21.1 usage
66.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · Akron
47
417 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Akron
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8356
Paul Harding · Fort Wayne, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,237
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Marquelo Suel quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit