Usage Score
25.9
Player Dossier
2011-2012Purdue
Akeem Shavers
RB • 5'11" • Texarkana, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Akeem Shavers leans balanced backfield option traits and 59.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
59.1
Consistency
63.1
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Purdue
11111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Akeem Shavers, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Purdue. Akeem Shavers leans balanced backfield option traits and 59.1 efficiency.
Akeem Shavers played RB for Purdue. Across 2 tracked seasons, Akeem Shavers recorded 1,390 rushing yards, 428 receiving yards, and 16 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Purdue paired 1,241 primary output with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Purdue
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
95.5
Efficiency
59.1
Usage
25.9
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 147. Eastern Kentucky: 81. Notre Dame: 59. Eastern Michigan: 65. Marshall: 73. Michigan: 54. Wisconsin: 50. Ohio State: 123. Minnesota: 90. Penn State: 57. Iowa: 118. Illinois: 99. Indiana: 225
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 18 by 75.5. Eastern Kentucky: 12 by 70.2. Notre Dame: 13 by 38.2. Eastern Michigan: 12 by 57.6. Marshall: 25 by 30.4. Michigan: 10 by 43.8. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.9. Ohio State: 10 by 76.8. Minnesota: 12 by 75.6. Penn State: 7 by 83.9. Iowa: 20 by 48.1. Illinois: 22 by 48.2. Indiana: 29 by 61.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins110.2 · Games = 6 · +27.3 vs Losses
Losses82.9 · Games = 7 · -27.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
83.9 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-58 | 14 | 93 | 6.60 | 0 | 4 | 54 | 8.2 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 56-35 | 27 | 126 | 4.70 | 1 | 2 | 99 | 7.8 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Illinois | W 20-17 | 21 | 99 | 4.70 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 27-24 | 17 | 64 | 3.80 | 1 | 3 | 54 | 5.9 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | L 9-34 | 7 | 57 | 8.10 | 0 | — | — | 8.1 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-44 | 11 | 78 | 7.10 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio State | L 22-29 | 7 | 30 | 4.30 | 0 | 3 | 93 | 12.3 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | 9 | 50 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Michigan | L 13-44 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Marshall | W 51-41 | 25 | 73 | 2.90 | 1 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 54-16 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-20 | 12 | 37 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 4.5 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 48-6 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2011-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 577 | 43.3 | 16.6 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 577 | 43.3 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 1,241 | 59.1 | 25.9 | 664 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,241 | 59.1 | 25.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
225
Primary metric
225 scrimmage yards and 49.2 usage.
#2
Western Michigan
149
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
149 scrimmage yards and 32.4 usage.
#3
Oklahoma State
147
Primary metric
Loss with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 31 usage.
#4
Ohio State
123
Primary metric
Loss with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#5
Rice
76
Primary metric
Loss with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 20.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Purdue
1,241 primary output · 59.1 efficiency · 25.9 usage
62
#2
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
62
1,241 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 25.9 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Purdue
39
577 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,818
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Akeem Shavers
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.