Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2025-2025BYU
QB • 6'2" • 220 lbs • Murrieta, CA, USA
Bear Bachmeier is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
27.8
Efficiency
64.3
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bear Bachmeier, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU. Bear Bachmeier is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Bear Bachmeier played QB for BYU. Across 1 tracked season, Bear Bachmeier recorded 3,033 passing yards, 527 rushing yards, and 3 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with BYU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
BYU paired 3,560 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with 356 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
254.3
Efficiency
64.3
Usage
27.8
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 325. Unknown: 129. Stanford: 182. East Carolina: 272. Colorado: 277. West Virginia: 394. Arizona: 261. Utah: 230. Iowa State: 356. Texas Tech: 200. TCU: 355. Cincinnati: 173. UCF: 293. Texas Tech: 113
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 39 by 57.9. Unknown: 16 by 75.3. Stanford: 39 by 55.7. East Carolina: 30 by 76.5. Colorado: 42 by 72.7. West Virginia: 37 by 73. Arizona: 51 by 50.9. Utah: 33 by 70. Iowa State: 47 by 69.2. Texas Tech: 49 by 50.5. TCU: 43 by 75.9. Cincinnati: 38 by 59.4. UCF: 34 by 71.2. Texas Tech: 36 by 41.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
76.5 vs East Carolina
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Georgia Tech300-yard game | W 25-21 | 27 | 38 | 325 | 71.1 | 1 | 1 | 57.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-34 | 16 | 27 | 115 | 59.3 | 0 | 2 | 41.3 | 9 | -2 | -0.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs UCF | W 41-21 | 21 | 25 | 289 | 84.0 | 1 | 0 | 71.2 | 9 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 26-14 | 15 | 25 | 127 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 59.4 | 13 | 46 | 3.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs TCUDual-threat | W 44-13 | 23 | 33 | 296 | 69.7 | 1 | 0 | 75.9 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-29 | 23 | 38 | 188 | 60.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.5 | 11 | 12 | 1.10 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-27 | 22 | 35 | 307 | 62.9 | 2 | 0 | 69.2 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs UtahDual-threat | W 24-21 | 13 | 22 | 166 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 70 | 11 | 64 | 5.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Arizona3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 33-27 | 12 | 29 | 172 | 41.4 | 1 | 2 | 50.9 | 22 | 89 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs West Virginia300-yard game | W 38-24 | 18 | 25 | 351 | 72.0 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ ColoradoDual-threat | W 24-21 | 19 | 27 | 179 | 70.4 | 2 | 0 | 72.7 | 15 | 98 | 6.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ East Carolina | W 34-13 | 18 | 25 | 246 | 72.0 | 1 | 0 | 76.5 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Stanford | W 27-3 | 17 | 27 | 175 | 63.0 | 0 | 0 | 55.7 | 12 | 7 | 0.60 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 7 | 11 | 97 | 63.6 | 3 | 0 | 75.3 | 5 | 32 | 6.40 | 2 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | BYU | 3,560 | 64.3 | 27.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | BYU | 3,560 | 64.3 | 27.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with 356 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency.
356
Primary metric
356 total offense with 69.2 efficiency.
#2
West Virginia
394
Primary metric
Win with 394 yards of offense and 73 efficiency.
394 total offense with 73 efficiency.
#3
TCU
355
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
355 total offense with 75.9 efficiency.
#4
Colorado
277
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
277 total offense with 72.7 efficiency.
#5
UCF
293
Primary metric
Win with 293 yards of offense and 71.2 efficiency.
293 total offense with 71.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · BYU
3,560 primary output · 64.3 efficiency · 27.8 usage
67.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · BYU
67.3
3,560 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 27.8 usage
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8933
Murrieta Valley · Murrieta, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
3,560
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.