Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2011-2015Tennessee
DeAnthony Arnett
WR • 6'0" • Saginaw, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
DeAnthony Arnett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.3
Consistency
67
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tennessee
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeAnthony Arnett, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tennessee. DeAnthony Arnett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 242 primary output with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
26.5
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
8.4
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 21. Western Michigan: 36. Air Force: 8. Rutgers: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Air Force: 1 by 53.3. Rutgers: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins28.3 · n=3
First Half28.5 · n=2 · +4 vs Second Half
Second Half24.5 · n=2 · -4 vs First Half
All Games26.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2011
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan State
2012-2015
Final stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tennessee | 242 | 65.1 | 16.8 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 69 | 80 | 5.6 | -173 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7 | 46.7 | 5.9 | -62 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 11 | 36.7 | 6.4 | 4 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 106 | 88.3 | 8.4 | 95 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 106 | 88.3 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Tennessee
242 primary output · 65.1 efficiency · 16.8 usage
59
#2
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
51.7
106 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
51.7
106 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.977
Saginaw · Saginaw, MI
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
435
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.