Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2015Michigan State
WR • 6'0" • Saginaw, MI, USA
DeAnthony Arnett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
24
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Player Story
DeAnthony Arnett built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a wide receiver from Saginaw, MI wearing No. 5, spending time with Michigan State and Tennessee. The clearest part of DeAnthony Arnett's career was...
Read the storyDeAnthony Arnett, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Tennessee. DeAnthony Arnett reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tennessee | 7 | 24 | 242 | 2 | 69.1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3 | 3 | 69 | 0 | 40.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 42.3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 39.8 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 4 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 56.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | 5 | 85 | 2 | 56.8 |
Related Context
DeAnthony Arnett played WR for Tennessee and Michigan State. Across 5 tracked seasons, DeAnthony Arnett recorded 6 rushing yards, 435 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 242 primary output with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
26.5
Efficiency
88.3
Usage
8.4
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 21. Western Michigan: 36. Air Force: 8. Rutgers: 41
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Air Force: 1 by 53.3. Rutgers: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
Player Story
DeAnthony Arnett built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a wide receiver from Saginaw, MI wearing No. 5, spending time with Michigan State and Tennessee. The clearest part of DeAnthony Arnett's career was his receiving role: 36 catches, 435 receiving yards, 4 touchdowns, and 6 rushing yards across 17 career games in the available record. His career also includes 6 rushing yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives DeAnthony Arnett's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2011
Opening stop
Michigan State
2012-2015
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tennessee | 242 | 65.1 | 16.8 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 69 | 80 | 5.6 | -173 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 7 | 46.7 | 5.9 | -62 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 11 | 36.7 | 6.4 | 4 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 106 | 88.3 | 8.4 | 95 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 106 | 88.3 | 8.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs South Carolina
Week 9 · L 3-14 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Receiving Yards
88.9 takeover
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Florida
Week 3 · L 23-33 · Conference game
59
Receiving Yards
83.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 49.2 efficiency score.
#3
@ Western Michigan
Week 1 · W 37-24
36
Receiving Yards
77.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Rutgers
Week 6 · W 31-24 · Conference game
41
Receiving Yards
75.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Middle Tennessee
Week 10 · W 24-0
47
Receiving Yards
74.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Tennessee
242 primary output · 65.1 efficiency · 16.8 usage
69.1
#2
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
56.8
106 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
56.8
106 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.