Player Stats

Shaq Washington College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,563
Receptions
240
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonCincinnati2314029.7
2012 Regular SeasonCincinnati1323050.9
2013 PostseasonCincinnati13336170.9
2013 Regular SeasonCincinnati1375747270.9
2014 PostseasonCincinnati135100071
2014 Regular SeasonCincinnati1361661471
2015 PostseasonCincinnati13211082.6
2015 Regular SeasonCincinnati1388971682.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 982 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

75.5

Efficiency

71.1

Usage

26.2

Consistency

71.8

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 11. Alabama A&M: 69. Temple: 53. Miami (OH): 44. Memphis: 120. Miami: 106. BYU: 103. UConn: 78. UCF: 72. Houston: 59. Tulsa: 91. South Florida: 52. East Carolina: 124

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 2 by 36.7. Alabama A&M: 7 by 65.7. Temple: 6 by 58.9. Miami (OH): 4 by 73.3. Memphis: 9 by 88.9. Miami: 8 by 88.3. BYU: 5 by 100. UConn: 8 by 65. UCF: 8 by 60. Houston: 4 by 98.3. Tulsa: 8 by 75.8. South Florida: 6 by 57.8. East Carolina: 15 by 55.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins83.4 · Games = 7 · +17.1 vs Losses
Losses66.3 · Games = 6 · -17.1 vs Wins