Player Dossier

2011-2015

Cincinnati

Alex Chisum

WR • 6'3" • Fayetteville, GA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Alex Chisum reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

12.1

Efficiency

73.2

Consistency

69.1

Season Value

63.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

1111121314141515

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Cincinnati
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Alex Chisum, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Alex Chisum reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 475 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 73.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

39.6

Efficiency

73.2

Usage

12.1

Consistency

69.1

Best Game by takeover score

San Diego State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 38. Unknown: 55. Temple: 60. Miami (OH): 20. Memphis: 77. Miami: 11. BYU: 45. UConn: 5. Houston: 60. Tulsa: 35. South Florida: 63. East Carolina: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 63.3. Unknown: 4 by 91.7. Temple: 7 by 57.1. Miami (OH): 2 by 66.7. Memphis: 5 by 100. Miami: 1 by 73.3. BYU: 2 by 100. UConn: 2 by 16.7. Houston: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 70. East Carolina: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Wins15.4 · n=5 · -41.8 vs Losses
Losses57.2 · n=6 · +41.8 vs Wins
First Half43.5 · n=6 · +7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half35.7 · n=6 · -7.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Memphis

Best efficiency game

100 vs Tulsa

Result
Fri 12/25vs San Diego StateL 7-424389.59.50019
Sat 11/28@ East CarolinaW 19-16166606
Sat 11/21@ South FloridaL 27-6566310.510.50036
Sun 11/15vs TulsaW 49-3823517.517.50031
Sat 11/7@ HoustonL 30-332603030045
Sat 10/24vs UConnW 37-13252.52.5003
Sat 10/17@ BYUL 24-3824522.522.50025
Thu 10/1vs MiamiW 34-231111111011
Thu 9/24@ MemphisL 46-5357715.415.40020
Sat 9/19@ Miami (OH)W 37-332201010012
Sun 9/13vs TempleL 26-347608.68.60014
Sun 9/6vs Unknown45513.813.80128

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Cincinnati

    2011-2015

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20112011201220132014201420152015
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2011 PostseasonCincinnati30284.810.4
2011 Regular SeasonCincinnati30284.810.40
2012 Regular SeasonCincinnati14072.48.3-162
2013 Regular SeasonCincinnati0-140
2014 PostseasonCincinnati24269.19.5242
2014 Regular SeasonCincinnati24269.19.50
2015 PostseasonCincinnati47573.212.1233
2015 Regular SeasonCincinnati47573.212.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

45

Primary metric

45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Memphis

77

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

South Florida

73

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Virginia Tech

39

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Rutgers

57

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2015 Postseason · Cincinnati

475 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 12.1 usage

63.6

#2

2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati

63.6

475 primary · 73.2 efficiency · 12.1 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · Cincinnati

54.4

302 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2011 · Rating 0.8431

Sandy Creek · Tyrone, GA

Committed To
Cincinnati
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2011

Career Facts

1

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

1,159

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Alex Chisum quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
8
Career receiving yards
1,159