Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Cincinnati
WR • 6'3" • Fayetteville, GA, USA
Alex Chisum reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.1
Efficiency
73.2
Consistency
69.1
Season Value
63.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Chisum, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Alex Chisum reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 475 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
39.6
Efficiency
73.2
Usage
12.1
Consistency
69.1
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 38. Unknown: 55. Temple: 60. Miami (OH): 20. Memphis: 77. Miami: 11. BYU: 45. UConn: 5. Houston: 60. Tulsa: 35. South Florida: 63. East Carolina: 6
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 63.3. Unknown: 4 by 91.7. Temple: 7 by 57.1. Miami (OH): 2 by 66.7. Memphis: 5 by 100. Miami: 1 by 73.3. BYU: 2 by 100. UConn: 2 by 16.7. Houston: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 70. East Carolina: 1 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina | W 19-16 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida | L 27-65 | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Tulsa | W 49-38 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston | L 30-33 | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConn | W 37-13 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 10/1 | vs Miami | W 34-23 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis | L 46-53 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Cincinnati | 302 | 84.8 | 10.4 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 302 | 84.8 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 140 | 72.4 | 8.3 | -162 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | -140 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 242 | 69.1 | 9.5 | 242 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 242 | 69.1 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 475 | 73.2 | 12.1 | 233 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 475 | 73.2 | 12.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
45
Primary metric
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
475 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 12.1 usage
63.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
63.6
475 primary · 73.2 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
54.4
302 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8431
Sandy Creek · Tyrone, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,159
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Alex Chisum quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit