Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2011-2015Stanford
RB • 5'9" • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Remound Wright leans balanced backfield option traits and 30.1 efficiency.
Usage Score
10.9
Efficiency
30.1
Consistency
52.9
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Remound Wright, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford. Remound Wright leans balanced backfield option traits and 30.1 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Stanford paired 668 primary output with 48.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 30.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with 53 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
20.6
Efficiency
30.1
Usage
10.9
Consistency
52.9
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 30. Northwestern: 30. UCF: 29. USC: 53. Oregon State: 13. Arizona: 45. UCLA: 6. Washington: 20. Washington State: 7. Colorado: 6. Oregon: 7. California: 8. Notre Dame: 10. USC: 24
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 5 by 62.5. Northwestern: 6 by 45.8. UCF: 7 by 41. USC: 12 by 41.7. Oregon State: 7 by 19.3. Arizona: 11 by 35.2. UCLA: 3 by 20.8. Washington: 8 by 26. Washington State: 4 by 18.2. Colorado: 4 by 15.6. Oregon: 3 by 24.3. California: 5 by 16.7. Notre Dame: 5 by 22.4. USC: 8 by 31.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Iowa | W 45-16 | 5 | 30 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs USC | W 41-22 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Notre Dame2+ TD | W 38-36 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs California2+ TD | W 35-22 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | 2 | — | — | 1.6 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Oregon | L 36-38 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Colorado | W 42-10 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 1 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Washington State | W 30-28 | 4 | 7 | 1.80 | 1 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Washington | W 31-14 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 1 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Fri 10/16 | vs UCLA | W 56-35 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Arizona2+ TD | W 55-17 | 10 | 29 | 2.90 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 4.1 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Oregon State2+ TD | W 42-24 | 7 | 13 | 1.90 | 2 | — | — | 1.9 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ USC2+ TD | W 41-31 | 11 | 41 | 3.70 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 4.4 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs UCF | W 31-7 | 5 | 19 | 3.80 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 4.1 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Northwestern | L 6-16 | 5 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 116 | 41.2 | 4 | 116 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 102 | 36.6 | 4.2 | -14 |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 668 | 48.2 | 21.4 | 566 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 668 | 48.2 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 288 | 30.1 | 10.9 | -380 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 288 | 30.1 | 10.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56
Primary metric
56 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
#2
Washington State
101
Primary metric
Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
101 scrimmage yards and 27.8 usage.
#3
California
92
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
92 scrimmage yards and 37.1 usage.
#4
USC
81
Primary metric
Loss with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
#5
Duke
40
Primary metric
Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 9.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Stanford
668 primary output · 48.2 efficiency · 21.4 usage
59.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
59.5
668 primary · 48.2 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Stanford
35
288 primary · 30.1 efficiency · 10.9 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9084
Bishop Dwenger · Fort Wayne, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,174
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Remound Wright quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit