Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2015UTEP
RB • 5'10" • Humble, TX, USA
LaQuintus Dowell leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
31
Developing production for a back
Reliability
35
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
42
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
LaQuintus Dowell built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a running back from Humble, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of LaQuintus Dowell's career was his backfield work: 576...
Read the storyLaQuintus Dowell, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · UTEP. LaQuintus Dowell leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 175 | 165 | 10 | 0 | 37 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 5 | 135 | 135 | 0 | 1 | 45.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 8 | 276 | 276 | 0 | 2 | 59.4 |
Related Context
LaQuintus Dowell played RB for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, LaQuintus Dowell recorded 576 rushing yards, 10 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTEP paired 276 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Win with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
34.5
Efficiency
41.4
Usage
14.4
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 0. New Mexico State: 76. Incarnate Word: 1. UTSA: 12. Florida International: 43. Florida Atlantic: 71. Southern Miss: 49. Rice: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 11 by 72. Incarnate Word: 2 by 5.2. UTSA: 4 by 31.3. Florida International: 9 by 49.8. Florida Atlantic: 15 by 49.3. Southern Miss: 16 by 31.9. Rice: 5 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
72 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/7 | vs Rice | W 24-21 | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-34 | 16 | 49 | 3.10 | 1 | — | — | 3.1 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 27-17 | 15 | 71 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Florida International | L 12-52 | 9 | 43 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs UTSA | L 6-25 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Incarnate Word | W 27-17 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ New Mexico State | W 50-47 | 11 | 76 | 6.90 | 1 | — | — | 6.9 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Texas Tech | L 20-69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Player Story
LaQuintus Dowell built his college career from 2011 through 2015 as a running back from Humble, TX wearing No. 7, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of LaQuintus Dowell's career was his backfield work: 576 rushing yards, 114 carries, 3 rushing touchdowns, and 10 receiving yards across 25 career games in the available record. His career also includes 10 receiving yards and 239 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives LaQuintus Dowell's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 175 | 40.1 | 6.3 | 175 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 135 | 51.4 | 6.5 | -40 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | 0 | -135 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 276 | 41.4 | 14.4 | 276 |
#1 Featured game
vs Tulane
Week 8 · W 24-20 · Conference game
Win with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72
Scrimmage Yards
74.2 takeover
72 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#2
vs Florida Atlantic
Week 8 · W 27-17 · Conference game
71
Scrimmage Yards
73.1 takeover
Win with 71 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
71 scrimmage yards and 26.8 usage.
#3
@ New Mexico State
Week 3 · W 50-47
76
Scrimmage Yards
72.8 takeover
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 16.2 usage.
#4
@ New Mexico State
Week 3 · W 42-21
55
Scrimmage Yards
69.2 takeover
Win with 55 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
55 scrimmage yards and 2.7 usage.
#5
@ Southern Miss
Week 9 · L 13-34 · Conference game
49
Scrimmage Yards
64.5 takeover
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 34 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
276 primary output · 41.4 efficiency · 14.4 usage
59.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
45.5
135 primary · 51.4 efficiency · 6.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.