Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Baylor
Kole Wilson
WR • 5'9" • 171 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kole Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Texas State
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas State • Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kole Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Texas State. Kole Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kole Wilson played WR for Texas State and Baylor. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kole Wilson recorded -4 rushing yards, 1,968 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Texas State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Texas State paired 747 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas State, Baylor.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Baylor
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
49.3
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
15.4
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 134. SMU: 21. Samford: 27. Arizona State: 16. Oklahoma State: 76. Kansas State: 50. TCU: 53. Cincinnati: 0. UCF: 56. Utah: 87. Arizona: 2. Houston: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 8 by 100. SMU: 2 by 70. Samford: 3 by 60. Arizona State: 2 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 84.4. Kansas State: 3 by 100. TCU: 3 by 100. UCF: 5 by 74.7. Utah: 4 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 13.3. Houston: 7 by 65.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins46 · Games = 5 · -5.6 vs Losses
Losses51.6 · Games = 7 · +5.6 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Houston | L 24-31 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Arizona | L 17-41 | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Utah | L 28-55 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs UCF | W 30-3 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ TCU | L 36-42 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kansas State | W 35-34 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Oklahoma State | W 45-27 | — | 6 | 76 | 9 | 12.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Arizona State | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Samford | W 42-7 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ SMU | W 48-45 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-38 | — | 8 | 134 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 57 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas State
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Baylor
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Texas State | 747 | 72.1 | 23.7 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas State | 747 | 72.1 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 630 | 77 | 16.7 | -117 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Baylor | 591 | 74.7 | 15.4 | -39 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Auburn
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Postseason · Texas State
747 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 23.7 usage
68.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Texas State
68.3
747 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 23.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Texas State
61.9
630 primary · 77 efficiency · 16.7 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,968
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kole Wilson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.