Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2022-2025Arizona
Chris Hunter
WR • 6'1" • 193 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.3
Consistency
70.4
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Arizona
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Hunter, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Arizona. Chris Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Hunter played WR for Arizona. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Hunter recorded 7 rushing yards, 695 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Arizona.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Arizona paired 372 primary output with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Arizona
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
37.2
Efficiency
83.3
Usage
11.5
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 21. Weber State: 28. Kansas State: 37. Iowa State: 59. Oklahoma State: 65. BYU: 50. Colorado: 12. Cincinnati: 51. Baylor: 12. Arizona State: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 2 by 70. Weber State: 2 by 93.3. Kansas State: 3 by 82.2. Iowa State: 5 by 78.7. Oklahoma State: 5 by 86.7. BYU: 2 by 100. Colorado: 1 by 80. Cincinnati: 2 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 80. Arizona State: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins34.6 · Games = 7 · -8.8 vs Losses
Losses43.3 · Games = 3 · +8.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ SMU | L 19-24 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Arizona State | W 23-7 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Baylor | W 41-17 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Cincinnati | W 30-24 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Colorado | W 52-17 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs BYU | L 27-33 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Oklahoma State | W 41-13 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa State | L 14-39 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Kansas State | W 23-17 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Weber State | W 48-3 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona | 323 | 59.4 | 16.4 | 323 |
| 2025 Postseason | Arizona | 372 | 83.3 | 11.5 | 49 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona | 372 | 83.3 | 11.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 97.1 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Arizona
372 primary output · 83.3 efficiency · 11.5 usage
66.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Arizona
66.3
372 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Arizona
51.1
323 primary · 59.4 efficiency · 16.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
695
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chris Hunter
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.