Usage Score
7.3
Player Dossier
2024-2025Pittsburgh
WR • 5'11" • 165 lbs • Clearwater, FL, USA
Censere Lee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.3
Efficiency
80
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Censere Lee, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Censere Lee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Censere Lee played WR for Pittsburgh. Across 2 tracked seasons, Censere Lee recorded 340 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 254 primary output with 62.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
28.7
Efficiency
80
Usage
7.3
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 6. Stanford: 48. Miami: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 1 by 40. Stanford: 2 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 254 | 62.2 | 12.6 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 86 | 80 | 7.3 | -168 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 86 | 80 | 7.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
21
Primary metric
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
41
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
Youngstown State
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
254 primary output · 62.2 efficiency · 12.6 usage
52.1
#2
2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh
47.5
86 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
47.5
86 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
340
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.