Usage Score
42.1
Player Dossier
2010-2013Western Kentucky
RB • 6'0" • Fort Campbell, KY, USA
Antonio Andrews leans workhorse runner traits and 70.2 efficiency.
Usage Score
42.1
Efficiency
70.2
Consistency
83.4
Season Value
73.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Andrews, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky. Antonio Andrews leans workhorse runner traits and 70.2 efficiency.
Antonio Andrews played RB for Western Kentucky. Across 4 tracked seasons, Antonio Andrews recorded 37 passing yards, 3,630 rushing yards, and 963 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Western Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Western Kentucky paired 2,208 primary output with 70.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 70.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
184
Efficiency
70.2
Usage
42.1
Consistency
83.4
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 136. Tennessee: 154. South Alabama: 160. Morgan State: 214. Navy: 217. UL Monroe: 177. Louisiana: 185. Troy: 269. Georgia State: 146. Army: 147. Texas State: 226. Arkansas State: 177
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 23 by 55.6. Tennessee: 14 by 95.8. South Alabama: 20 by 83.3. Morgan State: 18 by 99.5. Navy: 37 by 60. UL Monroe: 28 by 62.2. Louisiana: 31 by 59.2. Troy: 35 by 64.2. Georgia State: 25 by 55.6. Army: 27 by 53.2. Texas State: 26 by 86.2. Arkansas State: 24 by 67.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
99.5 vs Morgan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Arkansas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-31 | 20 | 119 | 5.90 | 1 | 4 | 58 | 7.4 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Texas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-7 | 21 | 204 | 9.70 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 8.7 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Army100 rush yards | W 21-17 | 24 | 117 | 4.90 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Georgia State100 rush yards | W 44-28 | 22 | 110 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 5.8 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Troy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 26-32 | 28 | 144 | 5.10 | 1 | 7 | 125 | 7.7 |
| Wed 10/16 | vs Louisiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 20-37 | 28 | 154 | 5.50 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 6.0 |
| Thu 10/3 | @ UL Monroe100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-10 | 27 | 155 | 5.70 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Navy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 19-7 | 32 | 182 | 5.70 | 2 | 5 | 35 | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Morgan State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 58-17 | 17 | 213 | 12.50 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11.9 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 24-31 | 15 | 122 | 8.10 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Tennessee100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 20-52 | 13 | 111 | 8.50 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 11 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Kentucky | W 35-26 | 20 | 99 | 4.90 | 1 | 3 | 37 | 5.9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Kentucky
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 211 | 51.2 | 8 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 58 | 46.9 | 3.8 | -153 |
| 2012 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 2,116 | 61.3 | 48.9 | 2,058 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 2,116 | 61.3 | 48.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 2,208 | 70.2 | 42.1 | 92 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
242
Primary metric
242 scrimmage yards and 62.8 usage.
#2
Louisiana
252
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
252 scrimmage yards and 62.3 usage.
#3
Troy
269
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
269 scrimmage yards and 48.6 usage.
#4
Southern Miss
210
Primary metric
Win with 210 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
210 scrimmage yards and 31.1 usage.
#5
Texas State
226
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
226 scrimmage yards and 39.4 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
2,208 primary output · 70.2 efficiency · 42.1 usage
73.9
#2
2012 Postseason · Western Kentucky
71.2
2,116 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 48.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
71.2
2,116 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 48.9 usage
21
100+ rush yards
17
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8267
Fort Campbell · Fort Campbell, KY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
4,593
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.