Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Buffalo
WR • 5'8" • 168 lbs • Webster, NY, USA
Victor Snow reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.4
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Victor Snow, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Buffalo. Victor Snow reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Victor Snow played WR for Nevada and Buffalo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Victor Snow recorded 182 rushing yards, 1,479 receiving yards, and 19 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 815 primary output with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nevada, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.9
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
27.4
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 67. St. Francis (PA): 67. Kent State: 34. Troy: 38. UConn: 68. Eastern Michigan: 136. Massachusetts: 112. Akron: 56. Bowling Green: 8. Central Michigan: 36. Miami (OH): 111. Ohio: 82
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 5 by 89.3. St. Francis (PA): 3 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 75.6. Troy: 5 by 50.7. UConn: 7 by 64.8. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 100. Massachusetts: 8 by 93.3. Akron: 7 by 53.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 60. Miami (OH): 9 by 82.2. Ohio: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Ohio | L 26-31 | — | 4 | 82 | 15.8 | 20.50 | 0 | 58 |
| Thu 11/20 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-37 | — | 9 | 111 | 10.4 | 12.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Central Michigan | L 19-38 | — | 4 | 36 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-3 | — | 1 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Akron | L 16-24 | — | 7 | 56 | 8.1 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Massachusetts100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-21 | — | 8 | 112 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 31-30 | — | 6 | 136 | 20.7 | 22.70 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs UConn | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 68 | 8.2 | 9.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Troy | L 17-21 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Kent State | W 31-28 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs St. Francis (PA) | W 45-6 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Minnesota | L 10-23 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 1 | 40 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nevada
2022
Opening stop
Buffalo
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Nevada | 1 | 6.7 | 4.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 80 | 5.6 | 11 |
| 2024 Postseason | Buffalo | 651 | 74.7 | 31.4 | 639 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Buffalo | 651 | 74.7 | 31.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Buffalo | 815 | 76.9 | 27.4 | 164 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Massachusetts
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Buffalo
815 primary output · 76.9 efficiency · 27.4 usage
68.8
#2
2024 Postseason · Buffalo
62.3
651 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 31.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Buffalo
62.3
651 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 31.4 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,479
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.