Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2022-2025Army
LB • 6'0" • 230 lbs • Liberty Hill, TX, USA
Andon Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
11
Efficiency
44.5
Consistency
55
Season Value
52.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andon Thomas, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army. Andon Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.5 disruption score.
Andon Thomas played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andon Thomas recorded 35 rushing yards and 197 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Army paired 12.5 primary output with 44.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 44.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
44.5
Usage
11
Consistency
55
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 1. Tarleton State: 1. Kansas State: 1. North Texas: 2. East Carolina: 0. UAB: 0. Charlotte: 0. Tulane: 0. Air Force: 2. Temple: 1.5. Tulsa: 3. UTSA: 0. Navy: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 5 by 30.8. Tarleton State: 14 by 60. Kansas State: 9 by 47.5. North Texas: 6 by 45. East Carolina: 13 by 50. UAB: 5 by 20.8. Charlotte: 4 by 16.7. Tulane: 8 by 33.3. Air Force: 10 by 61.7. Temple: 8 by 48.3. Tulsa: 10 by 71.7. UTSA: 9 by 37.5. Navy: 11 by 55.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
71.7 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs UConn | W 41-16 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/13 | @ Navy10+ tackles | L 16-17 | 11 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ UTSA | W 27-24 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulsa10+ tackles · Splash game | L 25-26 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Temple | W 14-13 | 8 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Air Force10+ tackles · Splash game | W 20-17 | 10 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Tulane | L 17-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Charlotte | W 24-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UAB | W 31-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/25 | @ East Carolina10+ tackles | L 6-28 | 13 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs North TexasSplash game | L 38-45 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Kansas State | W 24-21 | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Tarleton State10+ tackles | L 27-30 | 14 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Army | 8 | 31.1 | 9.3 | 8 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 8 | 31.1 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Army | 12.5 | 44.5 | 11 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 12.5 | 44.5 | 11 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.2 takeover score.
#3
Air Force
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#4
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.1 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Army
12.5 primary output · 44.5 efficiency · 11 usage
52.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Army
52.6
12.5 primary · 44.5 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Army
33.9
8 primary · 31.1 efficiency · 9.3 usage
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
197
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.