Usage Score
26.5
Player Profile
Mario Craver
WR • 5'9" • 165 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Mario Craver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.6
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Primary stop by seasons
- Mississippi State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Mario Craver, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Mario Craver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 911 primary output with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
78.6
Usage
26.5
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 92. UTSA: 122. Utah State: 114. Notre Dame: 207. Auburn: 34. Mississippi State: 80. Florida: 77. Arkansas: 34. LSU: 42. Missouri: 59. South Carolina: 6. Texas: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 7 by 87.6. UTSA: 8 by 100. Utah State: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 56.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 88.9. Florida: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 75.6. LSU: 4 by 70. Missouri: 6 by 65.6. South Carolina: 1 by 40. Texas: 5 by 58.7
Split Comparison
Wins77.5 · n=10 · +9.5 vs Losses
Losses68 · n=2 · -9.5 vs Wins
First Half108.2 · n=6 · +64.5 vs Second Half
Second Half43.7 · n=6 · -64.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 44 | 7.5 | 8.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 6 | 59 | 8.4 | 9.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.2 | 10.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 3 | 34 | 9 | 11.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 2 | 77 | 38.5 | 38.50 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | — | 6 | 80 | 14.4 | 13.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 41-40 | — | 7 | 207 | 29.6 | 29.60 | 1 | 86 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | W 44-22 | — | 5 | 114 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-24 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 368 | 89.5 | 11.4 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 911 | 78.6 | 26.5 | 543 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 911 | 78.6 | 26.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
207
Primary metric
207 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
911 primary output · 78.6 efficiency · 26.5 usage
65.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
65.6
911 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Mississippi State
54.8
368 primary · 89.5 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9056
Clay-Chalkville · Pinson, AL
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,279
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.