Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2024-2025Texas A&M
WR • 5'9" • 165 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Mario Craver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.5
Efficiency
78.6
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mario Craver, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Mario Craver reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mario Craver played WR for Mississippi State and Texas A&M. Across 2 tracked seasons, Mario Craver recorded 88 rushing yards, 1,279 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 911 primary output with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
78.6
Usage
26.5
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 92. UTSA: 122. Utah State: 114. Notre Dame: 207. Auburn: 34. Mississippi State: 80. Florida: 77. Arkansas: 34. LSU: 42. Missouri: 59. South Carolina: 6. Texas: 44
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 7 by 87.6. UTSA: 8 by 100. Utah State: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 100. Auburn: 4 by 56.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 88.9. Florida: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 3 by 75.6. LSU: 4 by 70. Missouri: 6 by 65.6. South Carolina: 1 by 40. Texas: 5 by 58.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 44 | 7.5 | 8.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 6 | 59 | 8.4 | 9.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.2 | 10.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 3 | 34 | 9 | 11.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 2 | 77 | 38.5 | 38.50 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | — | 6 | 80 | 14.4 | 13.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 41-40 | — | 7 | 207 | 29.6 | 29.60 | 1 | 86 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | W 44-22 | — | 5 | 114 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-24 | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 24 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2024
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 368 | 89.5 | 11.4 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 911 | 78.6 | 26.5 | 543 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 911 | 78.6 | 26.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
207
Primary metric
207 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
911 primary output · 78.6 efficiency · 26.5 usage
65.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
65.6
911 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Mississippi State
54.8
368 primary · 89.5 efficiency · 11.4 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9056
Clay-Chalkville · Pinson, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,279
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.