Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2024-2025Texas A&M
Terry Bussey
WR • 5'10" • 195 lbs • Timpson, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Terry Bussey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
47.7
Season Value
48.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
24242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terry Bussey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Terry Bussey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Terry Bussey played WR for Texas A&M. Across 2 tracked seasons, Terry Bussey recorded 103 rushing yards, 411 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Texas A&M.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 195 primary output with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
16.3
Efficiency
67
Usage
7.7
Consistency
47.7
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 13. UTSA: 5. Utah State: 55. Notre Dame: 27. Auburn: 10. Mississippi State: 13. Arkansas: 25. LSU: 12. Missouri: 4. South Carolina: 11. Unknown: 16. Texas: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 28.9. UTSA: 1 by 33.3. Utah State: 4 by 91.7. Notre Dame: 2 by 90. Auburn: 1 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 1 by 86.7. Arkansas: 1 by 100. LSU: 1 by 80. Missouri: 1 by 26.7. South Carolina: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 100. Texas: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18 · Games = 9 · +9.5 vs Losses
Losses8.5 · Games = 2 · -9.5 vs Wins
First Half20.5 · Games = 6 · +8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half12 · Games = 6 · -8.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | — | 2 | 27 | 9.3 | 13.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 216 | 62 | 10.8 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 216 | 62 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 195 | 67 | 7.7 | -21 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 195 | 67 | 7.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
195 primary output · 67 efficiency · 7.7 usage
48.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
48.1
195 primary · 67 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
45
216 primary · 62 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9945
Timpson · Timpson, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
411
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.