Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2012-2014South Alabama
QB • 6'5" • Mississauga, ON, Canada
Brandon Bridge is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
22.7
Efficiency
55
Consistency
75.1
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · South Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Bridge, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · South Alabama. Brandon Bridge is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Brandon Bridge played QB for South Alabama. Across 3 tracked seasons, Brandon Bridge recorded 2,325 passing yards, 467 rushing yards, and 21 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with South Alabama.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
South Alabama paired 2,224 primary output with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: App State
Win with 362 yards of offense and 73.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
202.2
Efficiency
55
Usage
22.7
Consistency
75.1
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 320. Kent State: 202. Mississippi State: 210. Georgia Southern: 164. Idaho: 267. App State: 362. Georgia State: 263. Troy: 94. Louisiana: 153. South Carolina: 10. Navy: 179
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 53 by 55.2. Kent State: 38 by 61.3. Mississippi State: 51 by 48.2. Georgia Southern: 47 by 40.7. Idaho: 31 by 77.3. App State: 37 by 73.4. Georgia State: 47 by 64.6. Troy: 25 by 46.2. Louisiana: 33 by 53.5. South Carolina: 13 by 33.1. Navy: 33 by 51.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
App State
Best efficiency game
77.3 vs Idaho
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/21 | @ Bowling Green | L 28-33 | 20 | 37 | 279 | 54.1 | 1 | 2 | 55.2 | 16 | 41 | 2.60 | 1 | 25 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Navy3+ TD | L 40-42 | 19 | 28 | 172 | 67.9 | 4 | 2 | 51.1 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ South Carolina | L 12-37 | 2 | 11 | 19 | 18.2 | 0 | 0 | 33.1 | 2 | -9 | -4.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Louisiana | L 9-19 | 16 | 27 | 177 | 59.3 | 1 | 0 | 53.5 | 6 | -24 | -4 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 10/24 | vs Troy | W 27-13 | 9 | 21 | 106 | 42.9 | 1 | 0 | 46.2 | 4 | -12 | -3 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Georgia State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 30-27 | 11 | 32 | 126 | 34.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.6 | 15 | 137 | 9.10 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ App State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 47-21 | 19 | 28 | 339 | 67.9 | 3 | 0 | 73.4 | 9 | 23 | 2.60 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ IdahoDual-threat | W 34-10 | 15 | 25 | 196 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 77.3 | 6 | 71 | 11.80 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Georgia Southern | L 6-28 | 13 | 34 | 149 | 38.2 | 1 | 2 | 40.7 | 13 | 15 | 1.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Mississippi State | L 3-35 | 21 | 39 | 203 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 48.2 | 12 | 7 | 0.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Kent State | W 23-13 | 15 | 25 | 161 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 61.3 | 13 | 41 | 3.20 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Alabama
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | South Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | South Alabama | 568 | 47.5 | 13.2 | 568 |
| 2014 Postseason | South Alabama | 2,224 | 55 | 22.7 | 1,656 |
| 2014 Regular Season | South Alabama | 2,224 | 55 | 22.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
270
Primary metric
270 total offense with 74.5 efficiency.
#2
Troy
289
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
289 total offense with 75.5 efficiency.
#3
App State
362
Primary metric
Win with 362 yards of offense and 73.4 efficiency.
362 total offense with 73.4 efficiency.
#4
Bowling Green
320
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
320 total offense with 55.2 efficiency.
#5
Idaho
267
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
267 total offense with 77.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · South Alabama
2,224 primary output · 55 efficiency · 22.7 usage
63.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · South Alabama
63.2
2,224 primary · 55 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · South Alabama
27.4
568 primary · 47.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
2
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,792
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.