Player Stats

Ryder Burton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
704
Passing yards
708
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2024 Regular SeasonWest Virginia00000-
2025 Regular SeasonUAB8704708-4947.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

UAB paired 704 primary output with 41.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 41.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, West Virginia, UAB.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UAB

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

88

Efficiency

41.6

Usage

13.7

Consistency

18.2

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 7. Army: 1. Memphis: 257. UConn: 203. Rice: 208. North Texas: 8. South Florida: 22. Tulsa: -2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 1 by 86.1. Army: 1 by 10. Memphis: 32 by 62.2. UConn: 43 by 50.3. Rice: 43 by 51.3. North Texas: 3 by 22.3. South Florida: 4 by 50.4. Tulsa: 3 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins127.5 · Games = 2 · +52.7 vs Losses
Losses74.8 · Games = 6 · -52.7 vs Wins