Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025UAB
Ryder Burton
QB • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Springville, UT, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Ryder Burton is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
41.6
Consistency
18.2
Season Value
43
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- BYU • West Virginia • UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryder Burton, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Ryder Burton is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Ryder Burton played QB for BYU, West Virginia, and UAB. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ryder Burton recorded 708 passing yards, -4 rushing yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UAB.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 704 primary output with 41.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 41.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, West Virginia, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with 257 yards of offense and 62.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UAB
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
88
Efficiency
41.6
Usage
13.7
Consistency
18.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 7. Army: 1. Memphis: 257. UConn: 203. Rice: 208. North Texas: 8. South Florida: 22. Tulsa: -2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 1 by 86.1. Army: 1 by 10. Memphis: 32 by 62.2. UConn: 43 by 50.3. Rice: 43 by 51.3. North Texas: 3 by 22.3. South Florida: 4 by 50.4. Tulsa: 3 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins127.5 · Games = 2 · +52.7 vs Losses
Losses74.8 · Games = 6 · -52.7 vs Wins
First Half117 · Games = 4 · +58 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · Games = 4 · -58 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
86.1 vs Tennessee
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tulsa | W 31-24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs South Florida | L 18-48 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 50.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Texas | L 24-53 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 22.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | 18 | 34 | 213 | 52.9 | 2 | 0 | 51.3 | 9 | -5 | -0.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | 21 | 30 | 209 | 70.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.3 | 13 | -6 | -0.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Memphis3+ TD | W 31-24 | 20 | 27 | 251 | 74.1 | 3 | 1 | 62.2 | 5 | 6 | 1.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 86.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2023
Opening stop
- 2
West Virginia
2024
Transition stop
- 3
UAB
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 704 | 41.6 | 13.7 | 704 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with 257 yards of offense and 62.2 efficiency.
257
Primary metric
257 total offense with 62.2 efficiency.
#2
UConn
203
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
203 total offense with 50.3 efficiency.
#3
Rice
208
Primary metric
Loss with 208 yards of offense and 51.3 efficiency.
208 total offense with 51.3 efficiency.
#4
Tennessee
7
Primary metric
Loss with 7 yards of offense and 86.1 efficiency.
7 total offense with 86.1 efficiency.
#5
South Florida
22
Primary metric
Loss with 22 yards of offense and 50.4 efficiency.
22 total offense with 50.4 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UAB
704 primary output · 41.6 efficiency · 13.7 usage
43
#2
2023 Regular Season · BYU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · West Virginia
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
2
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8464
Springville · Springville, UT
- Committed To
- BYU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
3
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
704
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 8 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.