Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,494 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | East Carolina | 10 | 64 | 658 | 6 | 66.5 |
| 2012 Postseason | East Carolina | 13 | 5 | 59 | 1 | 76.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 83 | 1,046 | 10 | 76.3 |
| 2013 Postseason | East Carolina | 13 | 9 | 66 | 0 | 78.1 |
| 2013 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 105 | 1,218 | 9 | 78.1 |
| 2014 Postseason | East Carolina | 13 | 11 | 160 | 1 | 89 |
| 2014 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 110 | 1,334 | 11 | 89 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,494 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
114.9
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
29.6
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 160. North Carolina Central: 87. South Carolina: 133. Virginia Tech: 47. North Carolina: 92. SMU: 120. South Florida: 114. UConn: 186. Temple: 35. Cincinnati: 188. Tulane: 104. Tulsa: 88. UCF: 140
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 11 by 97. North Carolina Central: 8 by 72.5. South Carolina: 11 by 80.6. Virginia Tech: 4 by 78.3. North Carolina: 6 by 100. SMU: 8 by 100. South Florida: 10 by 76. UConn: 14 by 88.6. Temple: 4 by 58.3. Cincinnati: 15 by 83.6. Tulane: 9 by 77. Tulsa: 9 by 65.2. UCF: 12 by 77.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.