Usage Score
29.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014East Carolina
WR • 6'0" • Vanceboro, NC, USA
Justin Hardy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29.6
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
76.4
Season Value
71.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · East Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Hardy, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · East Carolina. Justin Hardy reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Justin Hardy played WR for East Carolina. Across 5 tracked seasons, Justin Hardy recorded 147 passing yards, 7 rushing yards, and 4,541 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with East Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,494 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
114.9
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
29.6
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 160. North Carolina Central: 87. South Carolina: 133. Virginia Tech: 47. North Carolina: 92. SMU: 120. South Florida: 114. UConn: 186. Temple: 35. Cincinnati: 188. Tulane: 104. Tulsa: 88. UCF: 140
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 11 by 97. North Carolina Central: 8 by 72.5. South Carolina: 11 by 80.6. Virginia Tech: 4 by 78.3. North Carolina: 6 by 100. SMU: 8 by 100. South Florida: 10 by 76. UConn: 14 by 88.6. Temple: 4 by 58.3. Cincinnati: 15 by 83.6. Tulane: 9 by 77. Tulsa: 9 by 65.2. UCF: 12 by 77.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-28 | — | 11 | 160 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 66 |
| Fri 12/5 | vs UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-32 | — | 12 | 140 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ TulsaHigh volume | W 49-32 | — | 9 | 88 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-6 | — | 9 | 104 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/14 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-54 | — | 15 | 188 | 12.2 | 12.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Temple | L 10-20 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 10/23 | vs UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-21 | — | 14 | 186 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-17 | — | 10 | 114 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-24 | — | 8 | 120 | 15 | 15 | 3 | 38 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs North Carolina | W 70-41 | — | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-21 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-33 | — | 11 | 133 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs North Carolina CentralHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 52-7 | — | 8 | 87 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 2 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | East Carolina | 658 | 70.2 | 22.1 | 658 |
| 2012 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,105 | 72.7 | 27.5 | 447 |
| 2012 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,105 | 72.7 | 27.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,284 | 69.1 | 28.2 | 179 |
| 2013 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,284 | 69.1 | 28.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,494 | 81.1 | 29.6 | 210 |
| 2014 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,494 | 81.1 | 29.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
230
Primary metric
230 receiving yards with a 90.2 efficiency score.
#2
Cincinnati
188
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
188 receiving yards with a 83.6 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
186
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
186 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#4
Florida
160
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 97 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
171
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 71.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · East Carolina
1,494 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 29.6 usage
71.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · East Carolina
71.8
1,494 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 29.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · East Carolina
61.6
1,284 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 28.2 usage
17
100+ receiving yards
23
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,541
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.