Usage Score
36
Player Dossier
2010-2012Utah State
RB • 5'8" • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Kerwynn Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 71.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
36
Efficiency
71.4
Consistency
70.7
Season Value
69.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kerwynn Williams, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Utah State. Kerwynn Williams leans workhorse runner traits and 71.4 efficiency.
Kerwynn Williams played RB for Utah State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kerwynn Williams recorded 2,505 rushing yards, 870 receiving yards, and 28 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Utah State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Utah State paired 2,209 primary output with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
169.9
Efficiency
71.4
Usage
36
Consistency
70.7
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 269. Southern Utah: 78. Utah: 95. Wisconsin: 121. Colorado State: 227. UNLV: 260. BYU: 57. San José State: 206. New Mexico State: 176. UTSA: 158. Texas State: 126. Louisiana Tech: 287. Idaho: 149
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 20 by 100. Southern Utah: 17 by 45.4. Utah: 17 by 58.2. Wisconsin: 22 by 39.7. Colorado State: 24 by 89.4. UNLV: 27 by 75.4. BYU: 19 by 20.5. San José State: 19 by 95.2. New Mexico State: 16 by 85.3. UTSA: 16 by 84.4. Texas State: 21 by 64.5. Louisiana Tech: 24 by 99.8. Idaho: 21 by 70
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Toledo100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-15 | 18 | 235 | 13.10 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 13.4 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Idaho100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 45-9 | 17 | 110 | 6.50 | 1 | 4 | 39 | 7.1 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Louisiana Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-41 | 20 | 162 | 8.10 | 2 | 4 | 125 | 12.0 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Texas State100 rush yards | W 38-7 | 19 | 120 | 6.30 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTSA150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 48-17 | 13 | 90 | 6.90 | 2 | 3 | 68 | 9.9 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs New Mexico State150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 41-7 | 13 | 82 | 6.30 | 1 | 3 | 94 | 11 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ San José State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 49-27 | 15 | 176 | 11.70 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 10.8 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ BYU | L 3-6 | 14 | 18 | 1.30 | 0 | 5 | 39 | 3 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs UNLV100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-13 | 20 | 113 | 5.70 | 0 | 7 | 147 | 9.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Colorado State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-19 | 21 | 205 | 9.80 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 9.5 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-16 | 16 | 43 | 2.70 | 0 | 6 | 78 | 5.5 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Utah | W 27-20 | 17 | 95 | 5.60 | 1 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Southern Utah | W 34-3 | 15 | 63 | 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4.6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah State | 561 | 55.3 | 13.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Utah State | 605 | 61.4 | 11.2 | 44 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah State | 605 | 61.4 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Utah State | 2,209 | 71.4 | 36 | 1,604 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah State | 2,209 | 71.4 | 36 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
287
Primary metric
287 scrimmage yards and 38.1 usage.
#2
Toledo
269
Primary metric
Win with 269 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
269 scrimmage yards and 38.5 usage.
#3
Boise State
147
Primary metric
Loss with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 34.5 usage.
#4
UNLV
260
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
260 scrimmage yards and 48.2 usage.
#5
Colorado State
227
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
227 scrimmage yards and 39.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Utah State
2,209 primary output · 71.4 efficiency · 36 usage
69.5
#2
2012 Regular Season · Utah State
69.5
2,209 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 36 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Utah State
40.9
605 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 11.2 usage
8
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Valley · Las Vegas, NV
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,375
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.