Usage Score
9.8
Player Dossier
2010-2013Arizona State
Kevin Ozier
WR • 6'2" • San Diego, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kevin Ozier reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.7
Consistency
52
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Arizona State
1011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kevin Ozier, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Arizona State. Kevin Ozier reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kevin Ozier played WR for Arizona State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kevin Ozier recorded 847 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Arizona State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Arizona State paired 354 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
35.4
Efficiency
87.7
Usage
9.8
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 31. Sacramento State: 41. Wisconsin: 48. Stanford: 5. USC: 21. Notre Dame: 63. Washington: 88. Oregon State: 21. Arizona: 15. Stanford: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 2 by 100. Sacramento State: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 33.3. USC: 1 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Washington: 8 by 73.3. Oregon State: 1 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 70
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins39 · Games = 6 · +9 vs Losses
Losses30 · Games = 4 · -9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Texas Tech | L 23-37 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Stanford | L 14-38 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Arizona | W 58-21 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Oregon State | W 30-17 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs WashingtonHigh volume | W 53-24 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Notre Dame | L 34-37 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs USC | W 62-41 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Stanford | L 28-42 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 32-30 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 34 |
| Fri 9/6 | vs Sacramento State | W 55-0 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 1 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona State | 169 | 86.9 | 7.2 | 169 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona State | 324 | 81.1 | 9.9 | 155 |
| 2013 Postseason | Arizona State | 354 | 87.7 | 9.8 | 30 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona State | 354 | 87.7 | 9.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Arizona State
354 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 9.8 usage
62.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Arizona State
62.4
354 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Arizona State
59.8
324 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 9.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
847
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kevin Ozier
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.