Player Dossier

2010-2014

Mississippi State

Malcolm Johnson

TE • 6'2" • Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Malcolm Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

11.7

Efficiency

81.1

Consistency

63.2

Season Value

63.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Mississippi State

101111121213131414

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
9
Program Path
Mississippi State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Malcolm Johnson, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Mississippi State. Malcolm Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Malcolm Johnson played TE for Mississippi State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Malcolm Johnson recorded 1,148 receiving yards and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Mississippi State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 380 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Alabama

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Mississippi State

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

31.7

Efficiency

81.1

Usage

11.7

Consistency

63.2

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 36. Southern Miss: 29. UAB: 6. South Alabama: 15. LSU: 25. Auburn: 60. Kentucky: 21. Arkansas: 42. UT Martin: 30. Alabama: 74. Vanderbilt: 28. Ole Miss: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 3 by 80. Southern Miss: 2 by 96.7. UAB: 1 by 40. South Alabama: 1 by 100. LSU: 1 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 80. Kentucky: 2 by 70. Arkansas: 2 by 100. UT Martin: 3 by 66.7. Alabama: 4 by 100. Vanderbilt: 2 by 93.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28.4 · Games = 9 · -12.9 vs Losses
Losses41.3 · Games = 3 · +12.9 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Alabama

Best efficiency game

100 vs Alabama

Result
Thu 1/1@ Georgia TechL 34-493361212014
Sat 11/29@ Ole MissL 17-312147709
Sun 11/23vs VanderbiltW 51-02281414119
Sat 11/15@ AlabamaL 20-2547418.518.50030
Sat 11/8vs UT MartinW 45-163301010012
Sat 11/1vs ArkansasW 17-102422121021
Sat 10/25@ KentuckyW 45-3122110.510.50015
Sat 10/11vs AuburnW 38-235601212015
Sat 9/20@ LSUW 34-291252525025
Sat 9/13@ South AlabamaW 35-31151515115
Sat 9/6vs UABW 47-34166606
Sat 8/30vs Southern MissW 49-022914.514.50123

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Mississippi State

    2010-2014

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

201020112011201220122013201320142014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2010 Regular SeasonMississippi State0
2011 PostseasonMississippi State20690.511.3206
2011 Regular SeasonMississippi State20690.511.30
2012 PostseasonMississippi State17194.58.6-35
2012 Regular SeasonMississippi State17194.58.60
2013 PostseasonMississippi State39170.313.4220
2013 Regular SeasonMississippi State39170.313.40
2014 PostseasonMississippi State38081.111.7-11
2014 Regular SeasonMississippi State38081.111.70

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Alabama

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

84

Primary metric

84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.

#2

South Carolina

51

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Alabama

74

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Kentucky

79

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

LSU

40

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2014 Postseason · Mississippi State

380 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 11.7 usage

63.3

#2

2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State

63.3

380 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 11.7 usage

#3

2012 Postseason · Mississippi State

57.8

171 primary · 94.5 efficiency · 8.6 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

9

Seasons tracked

1,148

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.