Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2010-2013LSU
Alfred Blue
RB • 6'2" • Boutte, LA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Alfred Blue leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
49.1
Consistency
45.3
Season Value
45.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · LSU
101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alfred Blue, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · LSU. Alfred Blue leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.1 efficiency.
Alfred Blue played RB for LSU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Alfred Blue recorded 1,253 rushing yards, 105 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
LSU paired 315 primary output with 68.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · LSU
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
31.2
Efficiency
49.1
Usage
10.2
Consistency
45.3
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 43. TCU: 89. UAB: 8. Kent State: 56. Auburn: 24. Georgia: 6. Mississippi State: 50. Florida: -2. Ole Miss: 3. Furman: 46. Alabama: 4. Texas A&M: 61. Arkansas: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 8 by 45.6. TCU: 19 by 48.8. UAB: 3 by 27.8. Kent State: 10 by 58.3. Auburn: 4 by 62.5. Georgia: 1 by 62.5. Mississippi State: 8 by 58.3. Florida: 1 by 0. Ole Miss: 1 by 31.3. Furman: 5 by 75.8. Alabama: 1 by 33.3. Texas A&M: 13 by 48.9. Arkansas: 2 by 85.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins39.2 · Games = 10 · +34.9 vs Losses
Losses4.3 · Games = 3 · -34.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
85.4 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Iowa | W 21-14 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5.4 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Arkansas | W 31-27 | 2 | 17 | 8.50 | 0 | — | — | 8.5 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Texas A&M | W 34-10 | 13 | 61 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Alabama | L 17-38 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Furman | W 48-16 | 4 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 9.2 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Ole Miss | L 24-27 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida | W 17-6 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | — | — | -2 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Mississippi State | W 59-26 | 6 | 31 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Georgia | L 41-44 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Auburn | W 35-21 | 4 | 24 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kent State | W 45-13 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UAB | W 56-17 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ TCU | W 37-27 | 19 | 89 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | LSU | 102 | 48.3 | 8.4 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | LSU | 536 | 56.5 | 13.8 | 434 |
| 2011 Regular Season | LSU | 536 | 56.5 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | LSU | 315 | 68.1 | 25.7 | -221 |
| 2013 Postseason | LSU | 405 | 49.1 | 10.2 | 90 |
| 2013 Regular Season | LSU | 405 | 49.1 | 10.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with 119 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
119
Primary metric
119 scrimmage yards and 18 usage.
#2
North Texas
127
Primary metric
Win with 127 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
127 scrimmage yards and 28.1 usage.
#3
Washington
120
Primary metric
Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
120 scrimmage yards and 25.8 usage.
#4
Georgia
92
Primary metric
Win with 92 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
92 scrimmage yards and 23.1 usage.
#5
Mississippi State
36
Primary metric
Win with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
36 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · LSU
315 primary output · 68.1 efficiency · 25.7 usage
58.3
#2
2011 Postseason · LSU
57.3
536 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · LSU
57.3
536 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,358
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Alfred Blue
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.