Usage Score
28.2
Player Dossier
2010-2011Bowling Green
Eugene Cooper
WR • 5'9" • Mount Vernon, NY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Eugene Cooper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.2
Consistency
74.1
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eugene Cooper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Eugene Cooper reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 808 primary output with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
73.5
Efficiency
74.2
Usage
28.2
Consistency
74.1
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 110. Unknown: 134. Wyoming: 79. Miami (OH): 51. Western Michigan: 72. Toledo: 50. Temple: 50. Kent State: 82. Northern Illinois: 27. Ohio: 63. Buffalo: 90
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho: 4 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Wyoming: 8 by 65.8. Miami (OH): 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 9 by 53.3. Toledo: 7 by 47.6. Temple: 4 by 83.3. Kent State: 9 by 60.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 45. Ohio: 7 by 60. Buffalo: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins75.3 · n=4 · +13.1 vs Losses
Losses62.2 · n=6 · -13.1 vs Wins
First Half82.7 · n=6 · +20.3 vs Second Half
Second Half62.4 · n=5 · -20.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Buffalo2+ TD | W 42-28 | — | 6 | 90 | 12.5 | 15 | 2 | 28 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ohio | L 28-29 | — | 7 | 63 | 8.7 | 9 | 1 | 17 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Northern Illinois | L 14-45 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Kent StateHigh volume | L 15-27 | — | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Temple | W 13-10 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Toledo | L 21-28 | — | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | L 21-45 | — | 9 | 72 | 8.4 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-23 | — | 3 | 51 | 15.8 | 17 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs WyomingHigh volume | L 27-28 | — | 8 | 79 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 134 | 21.6 | 22.30 | 4 | 37 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Idaho100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 32-15 | — | 4 | 110 | 23.8 | 27.50 | 2 | 76 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 130 | 49.7 | 9.2 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 808 | 74.2 | 28.2 | 678 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#4
Idaho
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
808 primary output · 74.2 efficiency · 28.2 usage
66.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
30.4
130 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 9.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
938
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.