Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2010-2014Army
—
Raymond Johnson-Maples shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
42.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Raymond Johnson-Maples, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Army. Raymond Johnson-Maples shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Raymond Johnson-Maples is listed for Army. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Army paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fordham
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Fordham
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 1. Stanford: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Yale: 0. Ball State: 0. Kent State: 1. Air Force: 0. UConn: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Fordham: 1. Navy: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Fordham
Best efficiency game
— vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/13 | vs Navy | L 10-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Fordham | W 42-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Western Kentucky | L 24-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 21 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs UConn | W 35-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 53 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Air Force | L 6-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Kent State | L 17-39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Ball State | W 33-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Yale | L 43-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Wake Forest | L 21-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Stanford | L 0-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Buffalo | W 47-39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 4 | — | — | 2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 3 | — | — | -1 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 3 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Duke
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Ball State
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Air Force
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Wake Forest
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Army
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · Army
54.6
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Army
42.1
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
9
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.