Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2010-2013Rice
TE • 6'2" • Paris, TX, USA
Jeremy Eddington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20
Efficiency
100
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
57.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Eddington, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Rice. Jeremy Eddington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeremy Eddington played TE for Rice. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeremy Eddington recorded 10 passing yards, 627 rushing yards, and 81 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
8.8
Efficiency
100
Usage
20
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. UTSA: 0. North Texas: 0. UAB: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 34 | 38.5 | 6.8 | 34 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 12 | 26.7 | 5.3 | -22 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 12 | 26.7 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 35 | 100 | 20 | 23 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35
Primary metric
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 55.6 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rice
57.1
35 primary · 100 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Rice
38.1
34 primary · 38.5 efficiency · 6.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
81
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.