Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2010-2011Wyoming
WR • 6'1" • Westbury, NY, USA
Mazi Ogbonna reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.6
Efficiency
57.8
Consistency
59.8
Season Value
58.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Wyoming
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mazi Ogbonna, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Wyoming. Mazi Ogbonna reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mazi Ogbonna played WR for Wyoming. Across 2 tracked seasons, Mazi Ogbonna recorded 22 rushing yards, 613 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Wyoming.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Wyoming paired 430 primary output with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
33.1
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
15.6
Consistency
59.8
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 0. Weber State: 42. Texas State: 6. Bowling Green: 79. Nebraska: 54. Utah State: 10. UNLV: 4. San Diego State: 51. TCU: 32. Air Force: 29. New Mexico: 78. Boise State: 8. Colorado State: 37
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 1 by 0. Weber State: 6 by 46.7. Texas State: 2 by 20. Bowling Green: 6 by 87.8. Nebraska: 2 by 100. Utah State: 2 by 33.3. UNLV: 1 by 26.7. San Diego State: 3 by 100. TCU: 3 by 71.1. Air Force: 3 by 64.4. New Mexico: 6 by 86.7. Boise State: 1 by 53.3. Colorado State: 4 by 61.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs San Diego State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs Temple | L 15-37 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Colorado State | W 22-19 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Boise State | L 14-36 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs New Mexico | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Air Force | W 25-17 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs TCU | L 20-31 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ San Diego State | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UNLV | W 41-14 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Utah State | L 19-63 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nebraska | L 14-38 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-27 | — | 6 | 79 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Texas State | W 45-10 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Weber State | W 35-32 | — | 6 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wyoming
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Wyoming | 183 | 60.9 | 14.1 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Wyoming | 430 | 57.8 | 15.6 | 247 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wyoming | 430 | 57.8 | 15.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Nebraska
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
San Diego State
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Wyoming
430 primary output · 57.8 efficiency · 15.6 usage
58.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Wyoming
58.3
430 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Wyoming
40.3
183 primary · 60.9 efficiency · 14.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
613
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.