Usage Score
24.5
Player Dossier
2010-2011East Carolina
QB • 6'3" • Lakeland, FL, USA
Dominique Davis is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.5
Efficiency
56.2
Consistency
80.1
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · East Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dominique Davis, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · East Carolina. Dominique Davis is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Dominique Davis played QB for East Carolina. Across 2 tracked seasons, Dominique Davis recorded 7,192 passing yards, 313 rushing yards, and -6 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with East Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
East Carolina paired 4,108 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 56.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 372 yards of offense and 66.9 efficiency. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
283.1
Efficiency
56.2
Usage
24.5
Consistency
80.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 273. Virginia Tech: 91. UAB: 357. North Carolina: 418. Houston: 146. Memphis: 332. Navy: 368. Tulane: 372. Southern Miss: 286. UTEP: 158. UCF: 265. Marshall: 331
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 62 by 54.8. Virginia Tech: 45 by 42.5. UAB: 45 by 56.6. North Carolina: 63 by 54.7. Houston: 27 by 41.4. Memphis: 45 by 69. Navy: 52 by 64.4. Tulane: 54 by 66.9. Southern Miss: 49 by 54.5. UTEP: 42 by 48.3. UCF: 43 by 63.7. Marshall: 60 by 57.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
69 vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Marshall3+ TD | L 27-34 | 32 | 48 | 285 | 66.7 | 3 | 3 | 57.4 | 12 | 46 | 3.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs UCF3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-31 | 19 | 31 | 203 | 61.3 | 4 | 1 | 63.7 | 12 | 62 | 5.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ UTEP | L 17-22 | 18 | 34 | 133 | 52.9 | 1 | 2 | 48.3 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Southern Miss3+ TD | L 28-48 | 22 | 36 | 262 | 61.1 | 2 | 2 | 54.5 | 13 | 24 | 1.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Tulane300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 34-13 | 29 | 46 | 329 | 63.0 | 1 | 1 | 66.9 | 8 | 43 | 5.40 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Navy300-yard game | W 38-35 | 40 | 45 | 372 | 88.9 | 2 | 0 | 64.4 | 7 | -4 | -0.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Memphis300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 35-17 | 28 | 37 | 307 | 75.7 | 3 | 0 | 69 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Houston | L 3-56 | 13 | 23 | 169 | 56.5 | 0 | 3 | 41.4 | 4 | -23 | -5.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs North Carolina300-yard game | L 20-35 | 41 | 58 | 417 | 70.7 | 2 | 2 | 54.7 | 5 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UAB300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 28-23 | 35 | 42 | 361 | 83.3 | 3 | 3 | 56.6 | 3 | -4 | -1.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Virginia Tech | L 10-17 | 20 | 38 | 127 | 52.6 | 0 | 1 | 42.5 | 7 | -36 | -5.10 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ South Carolina3+ TD | L 37-56 | 37 | 56 | 260 | 66.1 | 4 | 1 | 54.8 | 6 | 13 | 2.20 | 1 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | East Carolina | 4,108 | 58.3 | 21.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | East Carolina | 4,108 | 58.3 | 21.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | East Carolina | 3,397 | 56.2 | 24.5 | -711 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with 412 yards of offense and 61.4 efficiency.
412
Primary metric
412 total offense with 61.4 efficiency.
#2
Navy
433
Primary metric
Loss with 433 yards of offense and 67.3 efficiency.
433 total offense with 67.3 efficiency.
#3
Tulane
372
Primary metric
Win with 372 yards of offense and 66.9 efficiency.
372 total offense with 66.9 efficiency.
#4
North Carolina
418
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
418 total offense with 54.7 efficiency.
#5
NC State
395
Primary metric
Win with 395 yards of offense and 66.7 efficiency.
395 total offense with 66.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · East Carolina
4,108 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 21.7 usage
66.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · East Carolina
66.8
4,108 primary · 58.3 efficiency · 21.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · East Carolina
60.9
3,397 primary · 56.2 efficiency · 24.5 usage
19
250+ passing yards
13
300+ total offense
17
3+ TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
7,505
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.