Usage Score
16.8
Player Dossier
2010-2014UTEP
Jameill Showers
QB • 6'2" • Killeen, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Jameill Showers is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
60.6
Consistency
88.1
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP
101112131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jameill Showers, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · UTEP. Jameill Showers is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Jameill Showers played QB for Texas A&M and UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jameill Showers recorded 3,480 passing yards, 579 rushing yards, and 34 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
UTEP paired 2,170 primary output with 60.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 228 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · UTEP
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
166.9
Efficiency
60.6
Usage
16.8
Consistency
88.1
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 150. New Mexico: 137. Texas Tech: 159. New Mexico State: 167. Kansas State: 199. Louisiana Tech: 127. Old Dominion: 178. UTSA: 228. Southern Miss: 136. Western Kentucky: 194. North Texas: 120. Rice: 210. Middle Tennessee: 165
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 34 by 51.3. New Mexico: 26 by 61.6. Texas Tech: 37 by 52.6. New Mexico State: 22 by 72.6. Kansas State: 32 by 56. Louisiana Tech: 35 by 38.3. Old Dominion: 30 by 69.8. UTSA: 29 by 72.2. Southern Miss: 31 by 50.2. Western Kentucky: 29 by 58.5. North Texas: 15 by 80.3. Rice: 36 by 54.1. Middle Tennessee: 23 by 70.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins161.6 · Games = 7 · -11.6 vs Losses
Losses173.2 · Games = 6 · +11.6 vs Wins
First Half159.6 · Games = 7 · -15.9 vs Second Half
Second Half175.5 · Games = 6 · +15.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
80.3 vs North Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Utah State | L 6-21 | 13 | 24 | 126 | 54.2 | 0 | 1 | 51.3 | 10 | 24 | 2.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Middle TennesseeDual-threat | W 24-21 | 7 | 13 | 106 | 53.8 | 1 | 0 | 70.2 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Rice | L 13-31 | 17 | 30 | 209 | 56.7 | 0 | 0 | 54.1 | 6 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs North Texas | W 35-17 | 8 | 11 | 87 | 72.7 | 0 | 0 | 80.3 | 4 | 33 | 8.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Western Kentucky | L 27-35 | 9 | 22 | 158 | 40.9 | 0 | 1 | 58.5 | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Southern Miss | W 35-14 | 10 | 23 | 127 | 43.5 | 1 | 0 | 50.2 | 8 | 9 | 1.10 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ UTSA | W 34-0 | 12 | 18 | 191 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 72.2 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Old Dominion | W 42-35 | 17 | 26 | 152 | 65.4 | 2 | 0 | 69.8 | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 3-55 | 15 | 28 | 143 | 53.6 | 0 | 3 | 38.3 | 7 | -16 | -2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kansas State3+ TD | L 28-58 | 18 | 28 | 201 | 64.3 | 4 | 0 | 56 | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-24 | 13 | 16 | 126 | 81.3 | 1 | 1 | 72.6 | 6 | 41 | 6.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Texas Tech | L 26-30 | 9 | 25 | 116 | 36.0 | 0 | 0 | 52.6 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ New Mexico | W 31-24 | 11 | 22 | 116 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 61.6 | 4 | 21 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2010-2012
Opening stop
- 2
UTEP
2013-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
201020112012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 73 | 51.3 | 12.4 | 73 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 358 | 67.9 | 5.3 | 285 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,458 | 56 | 19.3 | 1,100 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 2,170 | 60.6 | 16.8 | 712 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 2,170 | 60.6 | 16.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Idaho
Win with 40 yards of offense and 94.4 efficiency.
40
Primary metric
40 total offense with 94.4 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
86
Primary metric
Game with 86 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
86 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#3
SMU
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards of offense and 92.1 efficiency.
76 total offense with 92.1 efficiency.
#4
UTSA
228
Primary metric
Win with 228 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
228 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#5
Colorado State
386
Primary metric
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 61.3 efficiency.
386 total offense with 61.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · UTEP
2,170 primary output · 60.6 efficiency · 16.8 usage
66.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
66.4
2,170 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 16.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
53.6
1,458 primary · 56 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8822
Shoemaker · Killeen, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,059
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.