Usage / Role
71%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2014UTEP
QB • 6'2" • Killeen, TX, USA
Jameill Showers is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
71%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
13
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
21
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Jameill Showers built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a quarterback from Killeen, TX wearing No. 3, spending time with Texas A&M and UTEP. The clearest part of Jameill Showers' career was his passing...
Read the storyJameill Showers, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · UTEP. Jameill Showers is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3 | 73 | 40 | 33 | 1 | 38.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 358 | 319 | 39 | 2 | 41 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 1,458 | 1,263 | 195 | 15 | 58.4 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 13 | 150 | 126 | 24 | 0 | 71.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 2,020 | 1,732 | 288 | 16 | 71.5 |
Related Context
Jameill Showers played QB for Texas A&M and UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jameill Showers recorded 3,480 passing yards, 579 rushing yards, and 34 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
UTEP paired 2,170 primary output with 60.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 228 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
166.9
Efficiency
60.6
Usage
16.8
Consistency
88.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 150. New Mexico: 137. Texas Tech: 159. New Mexico State: 167. Kansas State: 199. Louisiana Tech: 127. Old Dominion: 178. UTSA: 228. Southern Miss: 136. Western Kentucky: 194. North Texas: 120. Rice: 210. Middle Tennessee: 165
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 34 by 51.3. New Mexico: 26 by 61.6. Texas Tech: 37 by 52.6. New Mexico State: 22 by 72.6. Kansas State: 32 by 56. Louisiana Tech: 35 by 38.3. Old Dominion: 30 by 69.8. UTSA: 29 by 72.2. Southern Miss: 31 by 50.2. Western Kentucky: 29 by 58.5. North Texas: 15 by 80.3. Rice: 36 by 54.1. Middle Tennessee: 23 by 70.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
80.3 vs North Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Utah State | L 6-21 | 13 | 24 | 126 | 54.2 | 0 | 1 | 51.3 | 10 | 24 | 2.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Middle TennesseeDual-threat | W 24-21 | 7 | 13 | 106 | 53.8 | 1 | 0 | 70.2 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Rice | L 13-31 | 17 | 30 | 209 | 56.7 | 0 | 0 | 54.1 | 6 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs North Texas | W 35-17 | 8 | 11 | 87 | 72.7 | 0 | 0 | 80.3 | 4 | 33 | 8.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Western Kentucky | L 27-35 | 9 | 22 | 158 | 40.9 | 0 | 1 | 58.5 | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Southern Miss | W 35-14 | 10 | 23 | 127 | 43.5 | 1 | 0 | 50.2 | 8 | 9 | 1.10 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ UTSA | W 34-0 | 12 | 18 | 191 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 72.2 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Old Dominion | W 42-35 | 17 | 26 | 152 | 65.4 | 2 | 0 | 69.8 | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 3-55 | 15 | 28 | 143 | 53.6 | 0 | 3 | 38.3 | 7 | -16 | -2.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kansas State3+ TD | L 28-58 | 18 | 28 | 201 | 64.3 | 4 | 0 | 56 | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-24 | 13 | 16 | 126 | 81.3 | 1 | 1 | 72.6 | 6 | 41 | 6.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Texas Tech | L 26-30 | 9 | 25 | 116 | 36.0 | 0 | 0 | 52.6 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ New Mexico | W 31-24 | 11 | 22 | 116 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 61.6 | 4 | 21 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
Player Story
Jameill Showers built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a quarterback from Killeen, TX wearing No. 3, spending time with Texas A&M and UTEP. The clearest part of Jameill Showers' career was his passing role: 3,480 passing yards, 25 touchdown passes, 523 attempts, and 579 rushing yards across 30 career games in the available record. His career also includes 579 rushing yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Jameill Showers' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2010-2012
Opening stop
UTEP
2013-2014
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 73 | 51.3 | 12.4 | 73 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 358 | 67.9 | 5.3 | 285 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,458 | 56 | 19.3 | 1,100 |
| 2014 Postseason | UTEP | 2,170 | 60.6 | 16.8 | 712 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 2,170 | 60.6 | 16.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Idaho
Week 3 · W 37-7
Win with 40 yards of offense and 94.4 efficiency.
40
Total Offense
97.2 takeover
40 total offense with 94.4 efficiency.
#2
vs Sam Houston
Week 12 · W 47-28
86
Total Offense
91.7 takeover
Win with 86 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
86 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#3
@ SMU
Week 3 · W 48-3
76
Total Offense
90.2 takeover
Win with 76 yards of offense and 92.1 efficiency.
76 total offense with 92.1 efficiency.
#4
@ Colorado State
Week 5 · L 42-59
386
Total Offense
77.4 takeover
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 61.3 efficiency.
386 total offense with 61.3 efficiency.
#5
@ UTSA
Week 9 · W 34-0 · Conference game
228
Total Offense
75.5 takeover
Win with 228 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
228 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · UTEP
2,170 primary output · 60.6 efficiency · 16.8 usage
71.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
71.5
2,170 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 16.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
58.4
1,458 primary · 56 efficiency · 19.3 usage
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.