Usage Score
20.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Vanderbilt
QB • 6'1" • Chico, CA, USA
Jordan Rodgers is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
20.1
Efficiency
59.9
Consistency
88
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Rodgers, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Jordan Rodgers is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Jordan Rodgers played QB for Vanderbilt. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jordan Rodgers recorded 4,063 passing yards, 491 rushing yards, and 24 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Vanderbilt.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 2,610 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
217.5
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
20.1
Consistency
88
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 114. South Carolina: 206. Northwestern: 268. Georgia: 227. Missouri: 166. Florida: 210. Auburn: 200. Massachusetts: 239. Kentucky: 231. Ole Miss: 272. Tennessee: 254. Wake Forest: 223
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 29 by 53.8. South Carolina: 36 by 54.2. Northwestern: 48 by 60.1. Georgia: 36 by 60.6. Missouri: 29 by 51.2. Florida: 42 by 54.6. Auburn: 31 by 65.7. Massachusetts: 24 by 85.1. Kentucky: 35 by 57.5. Ole Miss: 44 by 55.7. Tennessee: 29 by 60.8. Wake Forest: 27 by 59.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
85.1 vs Massachusetts
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | vs NC State3+ TD | W 38-24 | 16 | 25 | 108 | 64.0 | 2 | 0 | 53.8 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Wake Forest | W 55-21 | 17 | 23 | 229 | 73.9 | 2 | 1 | 59.9 | 4 | -6 | -1.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Tennessee | W 41-18 | 13 | 26 | 245 | 50.0 | 2 | 1 | 60.8 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Ole Miss | W 27-26 | 21 | 36 | 279 | 58.3 | 2 | 0 | 55.7 | 8 | -7 | -0.90 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Kentucky | W 40-0 | 18 | 29 | 220 | 62.1 | 2 | 1 | 57.5 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Massachusetts3+ TD | W 49-7 | 17 | 21 | 217 | 81.0 | 2 | 0 | 85.1 | 3 | 22 | 7.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Auburn | W 17-13 | 15 | 25 | 173 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 65.7 | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Florida | L 17-31 | 17 | 31 | 237 | 54.8 | 1 | 0 | 54.6 | 11 | -27 | -2.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Missouri | W 19-15 | 14 | 24 | 182 | 58.3 | 0 | 1 | 51.2 | 5 | -16 | -3.20 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia | L 3-48 | 13 | 23 | 218 | 56.5 | 0 | 0 | 60.6 | 13 | 9 | 0.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/9 | @ NorthwesternDual-threat | L 13-23 | 17 | 33 | 217 | 51.5 | 1 | 0 | 60.1 | 15 | 51 | 3.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs South Carolina | L 13-17 | 13 | 23 | 214 | 56.5 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 13 | -8 | -0.60 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Vanderbilt
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 1,944 | 57.1 | 24.7 | 1,944 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 1,944 | 57.1 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 2,610 | 59.9 | 20.1 | 666 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 2,610 | 59.9 | 20.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with 317 yards of offense and 67.9 efficiency.
317
Primary metric
317 total offense with 67.9 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
306
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
306 total offense with 66.6 efficiency.
#3
Northwestern
268
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
268 total offense with 60.1 efficiency.
#4
Massachusetts
239
Primary metric
Win with 239 yards of offense and 85.1 efficiency.
239 total offense with 85.1 efficiency.
#5
Georgia
227
Primary metric
Loss with 227 yards of offense and 60.6 efficiency.
227 total offense with 60.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
2,610 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 20.1 usage
67
#2
2012 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
67
2,610 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 20.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Vanderbilt
53.4
1,944 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 24.7 usage
2
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
4,554
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.