Usage Score
37.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013Wake Forest
QB • 6'2" • Austin, TX, USA
Tanner Price is a pass-first distributor with 37.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
37.9
Efficiency
50.5
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
61.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tanner Price, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Wake Forest. Tanner Price is a pass-first distributor with 37.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Tanner Price played QB for Wake Forest. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tanner Price recorded 8,899 passing yards, 280 rushing yards, and 26 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 2,964 primary output with 56.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
206
Efficiency
50.5
Usage
37.9
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Presbyterian: 250. Boston College: 177. UL Monroe: 312. Army: 198. Clemson: 115. NC State: 350. Maryland: 236. Miami: 314. Syracuse: 146. Florida State: 3. Duke: 169. Vanderbilt: 202
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Presbyterian: 39 by 62.8. Boston College: 38 by 49.9. UL Monroe: 54 by 54.3. Army: 28 by 59.1. Clemson: 30 by 52.7. NC State: 57 by 63.5. Maryland: 45 by 57.8. Miami: 58 by 53. Syracuse: 59 by 40. Florida State: 4 by 10.4. Duke: 45 by 48.2. Vanderbilt: 44 by 54.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
NC State
Best efficiency game
63.5 vs NC State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Vanderbilt | L 21-23 | 16 | 32 | 155 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 54.3 | 12 | 47 | 3.90 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Duke | L 21-28 | 12 | 27 | 124 | 44.4 | 1 | 1 | 48.2 | 18 | 45 | 2.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida State | L 3-59 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 25.0 | 0 | 3 | 10.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Syracuse | L 0-13 | 22 | 54 | 173 | 40.7 | 0 | 1 | 40 | 5 | -27 | -5.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Miami300-yard game | L 21-24 | 25 | 45 | 302 | 55.6 | 2 | 1 | 53 | 13 | 12 | 0.90 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Maryland | W 34-10 | 26 | 36 | 231 | 72.2 | 1 | 0 | 57.8 | 9 | 5 | 0.60 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs NC State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 28-13 | 24 | 39 | 268 | 61.5 | 3 | 1 | 63.5 | 18 | 82 | 4.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Clemson | L 7-56 | 14 | 22 | 125 | 63.6 | 1 | 0 | 52.7 | 8 | -10 | -1.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ ArmyDual-threat | W 25-11 | 6 | 17 | 132 | 35.3 | 1 | 1 | 59.1 | 11 | 66 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UL Monroe300-yard game | L 19-21 | 28 | 47 | 310 | 59.6 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 7 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Boston College | L 10-24 | 18 | 30 | 191 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 49.9 | 8 | -14 | -1.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Presbyterian | W 31-7 | 14 | 25 | 219 | 56.0 | 1 | 0 | 62.8 | 14 | 31 | 2.20 | 1 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,469 | 51.6 | 18.4 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Wake Forest | 2,964 | 56.2 | 17.6 | 1,495 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 2,964 | 56.2 | 17.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 2,274 | 52.2 | 19.8 | -690 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 2,472 | 50.5 | 37.9 | 198 |
#1 Featured game
NC State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
350
Primary metric
350 total offense with 63.5 efficiency.
#2
Miami
314
Primary metric
Loss with 314 yards of offense and 53 efficiency.
314 total offense with 53 efficiency.
#3
UL Monroe
312
Primary metric
Loss with 312 yards of offense and 54.3 efficiency.
312 total offense with 54.3 efficiency.
#4
Maryland
342
Primary metric
Win with 342 yards of offense and 69.3 efficiency.
342 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#5
North Carolina
332
Primary metric
Win with 332 yards of offense and 59.8 efficiency.
332 total offense with 59.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Wake Forest
2,964 primary output · 56.2 efficiency · 17.6 usage
64.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Wake Forest
64.2
2,964 primary · 56.2 efficiency · 17.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Wake Forest
61.9
2,472 primary · 50.5 efficiency · 37.9 usage
12
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
8
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
9,179
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.