Usage Score
17.4
Player Profile
David Amador II
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
David Amador II reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.3
Consistency
54.1
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
2323242425
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTSA
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
David Amador II, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. David Amador II reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 376 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
40.3
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
17.4
Consistency
54.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 41. Texas State: 29. Colorado State: 0. Temple: 34. Rice: 8. North Texas: 12. Tulane: 113. South Florida: 56. Charlotte: 31. East Carolina: 75. Army: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 3 by 91.1. Texas State: 2 by 96.7. Colorado State: 4 by 0. Temple: 6 by 37.8. Rice: 2 by 26.7. North Texas: 1 by 80. Tulane: 10 by 75.3. South Florida: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 51.7. East Carolina: 5 by 100. Army: 5 by 58.7
Split Comparison
Wins45.4 · n=5 · +9.4 vs Losses
Losses36 · n=6 · -9.4 vs Wins
First Half20.7 · n=6 · -43.1 vs Second Half
Second Half63.8 · n=5 · +43.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 3 | 56 | 14.8 | 18.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-26 | — | 10 | 113 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 1 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 3 | 41 | 10 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 102 | 53 | 6.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 102 | 53 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 376 | 72.4 | 28.2 | 274 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 376 | 72.4 | 28.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 443 | 65.3 | 17.4 | 67 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
#2
Coastal Carolina
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 75.3 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
376 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 28.2 usage
63.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
63.7
376 primary · 72.4 efficiency · 28.2 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
57.5
443 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8263
North Shore · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
921
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.