Usage Score
17.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025UTSA
David Amador
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
David Amador reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.3
Consistency
54.1
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
2323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Amador, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. David Amador reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
David Amador played WR for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Amador recorded 52 passing yards, 62 rushing yards, and 921 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 376 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
40.3
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
17.4
Consistency
54.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 41. Texas State: 29. Colorado State: 0. Temple: 34. Rice: 8. North Texas: 12. Tulane: 113. South Florida: 56. Charlotte: 31. East Carolina: 75. Army: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 3 by 91.1. Texas State: 2 by 96.7. Colorado State: 4 by 0. Temple: 6 by 37.8. Rice: 2 by 26.7. North Texas: 1 by 80. Tulane: 10 by 75.3. South Florida: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 51.7. East Carolina: 5 by 100. Army: 5 by 58.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins45.4 · Games = 5 · +9.4 vs Losses
Losses36 · Games = 6 · -9.4 vs Wins
First Half20.7 · Games = 6 · -43.1 vs Second Half
Second Half63.8 · Games = 5 · +43.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 3 | 56 | 14.8 | 18.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-26 | — | 10 | 113 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 1 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 3 | 41 | 10 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 102 | 53 | 6.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 102 | 53 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 376 | 72.4 | 28.2 | 274 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 376 | 72.4 | 28.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 443 | 65.3 | 17.4 | 67 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
#2
Coastal Carolina
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 75.3 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
376 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 28.2 usage
63.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
63.7
376 primary · 72.4 efficiency · 28.2 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
57.5
443 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8263
North Shore · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
921
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.