Player Dossier

2022-2025

James Madison

Amar Thomas

DL • 6'1" • 241 lbs • Upper Marlboro, MD, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Amar Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.8 disruption score.

Usage Score

8.2

Efficiency

26.8

Consistency

46.4

Season Value

45.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · James Madison

22232324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
James Madison
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Amar Thomas, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · James Madison. Amar Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.8 disruption score.

Amar Thomas played DL for James Madison. Across 4 tracked seasons, Amar Thomas recorded 64 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with James Madison.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

James Madison paired 15.5 primary output with 26.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · James Madison

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

26.8

Usage

8.2

Consistency

46.4

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 1. Weber State: 1. Louisville: 2. Liberty: 0. Georgia Southern: 2. Georgia State: 1. Louisiana: 1.5. Old Dominion: 1. Marshall: 0. App State: 0. Washington State: 3.5. Troy: 2.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 4 by 26.7. Weber State: 3 by 22.5. Louisville: 3 by 32.5. Liberty: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Southern: 4 by 36.7. Georgia State: 1 by 14.2. Louisiana: 3 by 27.5. Old Dominion: 0 by 10. Marshall: 9 by 37.5. App State: 2 by 8.3. Washington State: 6 by 60. Troy: 3 by 37.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 10 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +0.3 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Washington State

Best efficiency game

60 vs Washington State

Result
Sun 12/21@ OregonL 34-5141100
Sat 12/6vs TroySplash gameW 31-143120.500
Sat 11/22vs Washington StateSplash gameW 24-20611.5000
Sat 11/15vs App StateW 58-1020000
Sat 11/8@ MarshallW 35-2394000
Sat 10/18vs Old DominionW 63-2700000
Sat 10/11vs LouisianaW 24-14300.5000
Sat 10/4@ Georgia StateW 14-7100.500.500
Sat 9/27vs Georgia SouthernSplash gameW 35-1041110
Sat 9/20@ LibertyW 31-1321000
Fri 9/5@ LouisvilleSplash gameL 14-2831000
Sat 8/30vs Weber StateW 45-1031000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    James Madison

    2022-2025

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

2022202320232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2022 Regular SeasonJames Madison0
2023 PostseasonJames Madison0.58.62.40.5
2023 Regular SeasonJames Madison0.58.62.40
2024 PostseasonJames Madison613.92.75.5
2024 Regular SeasonJames Madison613.92.70
2025 PostseasonJames Madison15.526.88.29.5
2025 Regular SeasonJames Madison15.526.88.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Washington State

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

3.5

Primary metric

3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.

#2

Georgia State

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.

#3

Southern Miss

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.4 takeover score.

#4

Troy

2.5

Primary metric

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 38.7 takeover score.

#5

Georgia Southern

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.4 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2025 Postseason · James Madison

15.5 primary output · 26.8 efficiency · 8.2 usage

45.3

#2

2025 Regular Season · James Madison

45.3

15.5 primary · 26.8 efficiency · 8.2 usage

#3

2024 Postseason · James Madison

17.2

6 primary · 13.9 efficiency · 2.7 usage

Milestones

0

Impact games

6

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

64

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.