Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025SMU
Cam Robertson
DE • 6'4" • 260 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cam Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
42.7
Consistency
56.1
Season Value
52.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU
222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- North Texas • SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Robertson, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Cam Robertson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Cam Robertson played DE for North Texas and SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cam Robertson recorded 111 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with SMU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 22 primary output with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across North Texas, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Texas A&M
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
42.7
Usage
11.6
Consistency
56.1
Best Game by takeover score
East Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. East Texas A&M: 6. Baylor: 0. Missouri State: 2.5. TCU: 3. Syracuse: 1. Stanford: 4.5. Clemson: 1. Louisville: 2. California: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 12.5. East Texas A&M: 4 by 66.7. Baylor: 8 by 33.3. Missouri State: 3 by 37.5. TCU: 6 by 55. Syracuse: 6 by 35. Stanford: 4 by 61.7. Clemson: 7 by 39.2. Louisville: 3 by 32.5. California: 8 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2.4 · Games = 7 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · -0.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
East Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs East Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ CaliforniaSplash game | L 35-38 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs LouisvilleSplash game | W 38-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson | W 35-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs StanfordSplash game | W 34-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCUSplash game | L 24-35 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri StateSplash game | W 28-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Baylor | L 45-48 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs East Texas A&MSplash game | W 42-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Texas
2022
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | North Texas | 9.5 | 15.3 | 6.1 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 9.5 | 20.2 | 7 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 9.5 | 20.2 | 7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 18.5 | 6.1 | 2.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 22 | 42.7 | 11.6 | 10 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 22 | 42.7 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Texas A&M
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#2
Navy
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#3
Florida International
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
#4
Stanford
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#5
Memphis
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · SMU
22 primary output · 42.7 efficiency · 11.6 usage
52.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
52.6
22 primary · 42.7 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · SMU
36
12 primary · 18.5 efficiency · 6.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
13
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
111
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cam Robertson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.