Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2009-2011Ohio
QB • 6'2" • Omaha, NE, USA
Phil Bates is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
5.8
Efficiency
53.8
Consistency
51.2
Season Value
35.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Phil Bates, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Ohio. Phil Bates is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Phil Bates played QB for Ohio. Across 3 tracked seasons, Phil Bates recorded 320 passing yards, 588 rushing yards, and 197 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Ohio paired 697 primary output with 51.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with 93 yards of offense and 84.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
23.4
Efficiency
53.8
Usage
5.8
Consistency
51.2
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 93. Gardner-Webb: 0. Marshall: 0. Rutgers: 3. Kent State: 23. Ball State: 45. Akron: 0. Temple: 23. Northern Illinois: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 6 by 84.4. Gardner-Webb: 2 by 0. Marshall: 2 by 0. Rutgers: 1 by 30. Kent State: 5 by 46. Ball State: 2 by 95. Temple: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 75
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-23 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Temple | W 35-31 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Akron | W 37-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ball State | L 20-23 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 95 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kent State | W 17-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rutgers | L 26-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Marshall | W 44-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Gardner-Webb | W 30-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ New Mexico State | W 44-24 | 1 | 2 | 58 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 84.4 | 4 | 35 | 8.80 | 0 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 697 | 51.4 | 20.7 | 697 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 697 | 51.4 | 20.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 211 | 53.8 | 5.8 | -486 |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
189
Primary metric
189 total offense with 87.5 efficiency.
#2
New Mexico State
93
Primary metric
Win with 93 yards of offense and 84.4 efficiency.
93 total offense with 84.4 efficiency.
#3
Temple
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
23 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
Akron
126
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
126 total offense with 98.3 efficiency.
#5
Marshall
106
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
106 total offense with 88.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Ohio
697 primary output · 51.4 efficiency · 20.7 usage
56.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ohio
56.2
697 primary · 51.4 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
35.3
211 primary · 53.8 efficiency · 5.8 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
908
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.