Usage Score
24.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Air Force
Drew Coleman
WR • 5'9" • Cedar Park, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Drew Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
28
Season Value
56.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Air Force
0910111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Coleman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Air Force. Drew Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Air Force
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
24.9
Consistency
28
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 15. Unknown: 42. Michigan: 6. UNLV: 0. Colorado State: 53. Navy: 106. Wyoming: 8. Army: 90. San Diego State: 6. Fresno State: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 40. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Navy: 4 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 53.3. Army: 4 by 100. San Diego State: 1 by 40. Fresno State: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins30.5 · n=2 · -3.5 vs Losses
Losses34 · n=7 · +3.5 vs Wins
First Half23.2 · n=5 · -21.8 vs Second Half
Second Half45 · n=5 · +21.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Rice | L 14-33 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Fresno State | L 15-48 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ San Diego State | L 9-28 | — | 1 | 6 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Army | L 21-41 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Wyoming | W 28-27 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Colorado State | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 53 | 26.5 | 53 | 1 | 53 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ UNLV | L 35-38 | — | — | — | 9 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Michigan | L 25-31 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 7 | 46.7 | 14.3 | 7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 119 | 80 | 11.3 | 112 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 341 | 81.5 | 24.9 | 222 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 341 | 81.5 | 24.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado State
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Postseason · Air Force
56.4
341 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Air Force
56.4
341 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 24.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7444
Vista Ridge · Leander, TX
- Committed To
- Air Force
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
467
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.